Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-lnqnp Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-30T20:51:34.387Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Fast GaAs Photoconductor Responses to Subnanosecond Proton Pulses

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 February 2011

B. Brullot
Affiliation:
Centre d'Etudes Nucléaires, DAM/CEM, B.P. 12, 91680 Bruyère-le-Chatel, France
R. Galli
Affiliation:
Centre d'Etudes Nucléaires, DAM/CEM, B.P. 12, 91680 Bruyère-le-Chatel, France
X. Lecat
Affiliation:
Centre d'Etudes Nucléaires, DAM/CEM, B.P. 12, 91680 Bruyère-le-Chatel, France
C. Rubbelynck
Affiliation:
Centre d'Etudes Nucléaires, DAM/CEM, B.P. 12, 91680 Bruyère-le-Chatel, France
T. Pochet
Affiliation:
LETI (CEA-Technologies Avancées), DEIN/SPE, Centre d'Etudes Nucléaires de Saclay, 91191 Gif-sur-Yvette Cedex, France
Get access

Abstract

GaAs photoconductors -have been tailored to detect ultrafast proton pulses having energies ranging between 4 and 9 MeV. The sensitivity, the linearity and the speed of response of the devices are analyzed as a function of their neutron pre-irradiation treatment. The dependence of the sensitivity on the proton energy and the applied polarization is also studied. Finally, the experimental results are compared with a simple theoretical model.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1993

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

[1] Friant, A., Saliou, C., Galli, R., Barday, S., Nuci. Instr. & Meth. A283, 318 (1989).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[2] Wagner, R.S., Bradley, J.M., Hammond, R.B., IEEE Trans. Nucl. Sci. NS–33, 250 (1986)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[3] Deutch, T.F., Leonberger, F., Foyt, A.G., Mills, D., Appl. Phys. Lett. 41, 403 (1982).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[4] Galli, R., CEA Report, NO R-5590 (1992).Google Scholar
[5] Schockley, W., Read, W.T., Phys. Rev. 87, 835 (1952).CrossRefGoogle Scholar