Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-hvd4g Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-01-29T23:49:17.983Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Geometrical Structure of Lattice Defect-Impurity Configurations Determined by TDPAC

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 February 2011

M. Deicher ,
O. Echt ,
E. Recknagel  and
Th. Wichert
M. Deicher
Affiliation:
Fakultät für Physik, Universität Konstanz, D-7750 Konstanz, Fed. Rep.Germany
O. Echt
Affiliation:
Fakultät für Physik, Universität Konstanz, D-7750 Konstanz, Fed. Rep.Germany
E. Recknagel
Affiliation:
Fakultät für Physik, Universität Konstanz, D-7750 Konstanz, Fed. Rep.Germany
Th. Wichert
Affiliation:
Fakultät für Physik, Universität Konstanz, D-7750 Konstanz, Fed. Rep.Germany
Get access

Abstract

The perturbed angular correlation technique (TDPAC) was applied to determine the orientation of the electric field gradient tensor induced by lattice defects at the probe 1l1In. The experimental results obtained for self-interstitials, vacancies and defect clusters in Cu, Ag and Au are shown and their microscopic interpretation is discussed.

Type
Research Article
Information
MRS Online Proceedings Library (OPL) , Volume 3: Symposium – Nuclear and Electron Resonance Spectroscopies Applied to Materials Science , 1980 , 435
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1981

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1. Properties of Atomic Defects in Metals, edited by Peterson, N.L. and Siegel, R.W., J.Nucl.Mat. 69 & 70, 1978.Google Scholar
2. Swanson, M.L., Howe, L.M. and Quenneville, A.F., J.Nucl.Mat. 69 & 70, 372(1978)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
3. Alder, K., Helv. Phys. Acta 26, 761 (1953).Google Scholar
4. Deicher, M., Minde, R., Recknagel, E. and Wichert, Th. in: Proceedings of the Fifth International Conference on Hyperfine Interactions, Berlin 1980, edited by H. Haas and G. Kaindl, to be published in Hyperfine Interactions.Google Scholar
5. Dederichs, P.H., Lehmann, C., Schober, H.R., Scholz, A., Zeller, R., J.Nucl.Mat. 69 & 70, 176 (1978).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
6. Weidinger, A., Wessner, R., Wichert, Th. and Recknagel, E., Phys.Lett. 72A, 369 (1979).Google Scholar
7. Wichert, Th., Deicher, M., Echt, O., Recknagel, E., Phys.Rev.Lett. 41, 1659 (1978)Google Scholar
8. Deicher, M., Echt, O., Recknagel, E. and Wichert, Th. in ref.4.Google Scholar
9. Deicher, M., Recknagel, E. and Wichert, Th., Rad.Effects, to be published.Google Scholar
10. Weidinger, A., Wessner, R., Recknagel, E. and Wichert, Th. in: Proceedings of the International Conference on Ion Beam Modification of Materials, Albany, USA, 1980, to be published in Nucl.Instr.Methods.Google Scholar
11. Pleiter, F., Hyperfine Interactions 5, 109 (1977)Google Scholar
12. Echt, O., Recknagel, E., Weidinger, A., Wichert, Th., Z.Physik B 32, 59 (1978)Google Scholar
13. Deicher, M., Echt, O., Recknagel, E. and Wichert, Th., in ref.4Google Scholar