Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-v9fdk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-10T08:27:27.942Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Hollow defect elimination during solution growth of SiC

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 March 2011

B. M. Epelbaum
Affiliation:
University of Erlangen-Nürnberg, Dept of Materials Science 6, Martensstr. 7, D-91058 Erlangen, Germany
D. Hofmann
Affiliation:
University of Erlangen-Nürnberg, Dept of Materials Science 6, Martensstr. 7, D-91058 Erlangen, Germany
M. Müller
Affiliation:
University of Erlangen-Nürnberg, Dept of Materials Science 6, Martensstr. 7, D-91058 Erlangen, Germany
A. Winnacker
Affiliation:
University of Erlangen-Nürnberg, Dept of Materials Science 6, Martensstr. 7, D-91058 Erlangen, Germany
Get access

Abstract

Using pure and alloyed silicon melt saturated with carbon we investigated systematically hollow defect elimination during SiC solution growth over a wide temperature range from 1500°C to 2100°C. In the process of solution growth all hollow defects present in a substrate demonstrate an evident tendency to act as growth centers and after an adequate period of treatment they were overgrown. Growth morphologies observed in the vicinity of hollow defects are rather different. A new visualization method is proposed, which reveals crystalline defects associated with hollow cores and allows to detect the quantity and the distribution of HD in a whole SiC wafer. Classification of hollow defects based on these observations is presented and the corresponding closing mechanisms are discussed.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2001

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1. Syvajarvi, M., Yakimova, R., Radamson, H.H. et. al., J. Cryst. Growth, 197, 147 (1999).Google Scholar
2. Hofmann, D., Müller, M., Materials Science & Engineering, B61–62, 29 (1999).Google Scholar
3. Rendakova, S., Ivantsov, V., Dmitriev, V., Mater. Sci. Forum, 264–268, 163 (1998).Google Scholar
4. Frank, F.C., Acta Cryst., 4, 497 (1951).Google Scholar
5. Si, W., Dudley, M., Glass, R., Tsvetkov, V., Carter, C.H. Jr, Mater. Sci. Forum, 264–268, 429 (1998).Google Scholar
6. Heindl, J., Dorsch, W., Strunk, H.P., Muller, St. G., Eckstein, R., Hofmann, D., Winnacker, A., Phys. Rev. Lett., 80, 740 (1998)Google Scholar
7. Dudley, M., Huang., X., Mater. Sci. Forum, 338–342, 431 (2000).Google Scholar
8. Wagner, R.S. and Ellis, W.C., Appl. Phys. Lett. 4, N5, 89 (1964)Google Scholar
9. Hofmann, D., Bickermann, M., Hartung, W., Winnacker, A., Mater. Sci. Forum, 338–342, 445 (2000).Google Scholar
10. Burton, W.K., Cabrera, N., Frank, F.C., Roy. Soc. London Philos. Trans. A243, 299 (1951).Google Scholar
11. Krishna, P., Jiang, S.S., Lang, A.R., J. Cryst. Growth, 71, 41 (1985).Google Scholar
12. Chernov, A.A., J. Cryst. Growth, 24/25, 11 (1974).Google Scholar
13. Epelbaum, B.M., Hofmann, D., Hecht, U. and Winnacker, A., Mater. Sci. Forum, 353–356, 307 (2001), in press.Google Scholar
14. Jackson, K.A., Liquid Metals and Solidification, ASM, 1958.Google Scholar
15. Glass, R.C., Henshall, D., Tsvetkov, V.F. and Carter, C.H. Jr, Phys. Stat. Sol. (b) 202, 149 (1997).Google Scholar