Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-t5tsf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-13T02:09:43.923Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Incorporation of Ambient Oxygen During Silicon Deposition and the Effects of Argon Ion Bombardment

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 February 2011

David W. Brown  and
Graham K. Hubler
David W. Brown
Affiliation:
NRC Research Associate at NRL
Graham K. Hubler
Affiliation:
Naval Research Laboratory, Washington, D.C. 20375–5000
Get access

Abstract

The composition of SiOx films deposited by electron-beam evaporation of silicon in an oxygen atmosphere was measured as a function of silicon deposition rate and oxygen pressure. The compositions varied between X = 0.03 and 2.1 depending on the ratio of O2 molecules to Si atoms arriving at the substrate. Bombardment with 500 eV argon ions caused X to decrease at low arrival ratio and to increase at higher arrival ratio. The results are analyzed using an adsorption model in which chemisorption of O2 occurs after physisorption into one of two states: one on silicon and one on SiO2. A fit to the data for the unbombarded samples is achieved if physisorption occurs only on silicon. From this fit a sticking coefficient of 0.05 is obtained for O2 chemisorption on silicon. The effects of ion bombardment are consistent with the model if bombardment allows O2 to also physisorb on SiO2 and migrate to silicon where it chemisorbs.

Type
Research Article
Information
MRS Online Proceedings Library (OPL) , Volume 201: Symposium A – Surface Chemistry and Beam-Solid Interactions , 1990 , 25
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1991

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Smidt, F.A., International Materials Reviews 35, 61 (1990).Google Scholar
2. Donovan, E.P., Brighton, D.R., Hubler, G.K., and Van Vechten, D., Nucl. Instrum. Methods B 19/20, 983 (1987).Google Scholar
3. Hubler, G.K., Van Vechten, D., Donovan, E.P., and Kant, R.A. in Processing and Characterization of Materials Using Ion Beams, edited by Rehn, L.E., Green, J.E., and Sinidt, F.A. (Mater. Res. Soc. Proc. 128, Pittsburgh, PA 1989) 55.Google Scholar
4. Hewett, C.A., Cabreros, E.M., Pai, C.S. and Lau, S.S., Nucl. Instrum. Methods B 15, 293 (1986).Google Scholar
5. Hubler, G.K., Van Vechten, D., Donovan, E.P., and Carosella, C.A., J. Vac. Sci. Technol. A 8, 831 (1990).Google Scholar
6. Barbee, T.W. Jr., Keith, D.L., Nagel, L., and Tiller, W.A., Electrochem. Soc. 131, 434 (1983).Google Scholar
7. Ritter, E., J. Vac. Sci. Technol. 3, 225 (1966).Google Scholar
8. Cassuto, A. and King, D.A., Surf. Sci. 102, 388 (1981).Google Scholar
9. Hofer, U., Puschmann, A., Coulman, D., and Umbach, E., Surf. Sci. 211/212, 948 (1989).Google Scholar
10. Ibach, H., Horn, K., Dorn, R., Luth, H., Surf. Sci 38, 433 (1973).Google Scholar