Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-8bhkd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-10T08:27:37.098Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Influence of Imperfections on Effective Properties of Cellular Solids

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 February 2011

Joachim L. Grenestedt*
Affiliation:
Department of Aeronautics, Division of Lightweight Structures, Kungl Tekniska Högskolan (Royal Institute of Technology), S-100 44 Stockholm, Sweden, joachim@flyg.kth.se
Get access

Abstract

The mechanical properties of cellular solids, or solid foams, is affected by “imperfections” such as wavy distortions of cell walls, variations in cell wall thickness, non-uniform cell shape, etc. The present paper is focused mainly on elastic stiffnesses of closed cell cellular solids. A “perfect” model is first discussed and shown to predict the behavior of PVC foams well. However, this model over-estimates the stiffnesses of aluminum foams. The relatively poor properties of the aluminum foam are believed to be caused by imperfections in the cells. The main body of the paper focuses on modeling different kinds of imperfections, and analyzing their impact on foam properties.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1998

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1. Grenestedt, J.L., “Influence of Wavy Imperfections in Cell Walls on Elastic Stiffness of Cellular Solids,” J.Mech.Phys.Solids, Vol.46, No. 1, pp. 2950, 1998.Google Scholar
2. Simone, A.E., Gibson, L.J., “The Effects of Cell Face Curvature and Corrugations on the Stiffness and Strength of Metallic Foams,” Dept. of Materials Science and Engineering, MIT, Cambridge, MA 02139, USA, 1997 (submitted).Google Scholar
3. Grenestedt, J.L., Bassinet, F., “Influence of Cell Wall Thickness Variations on Elastic Stiffness of Closed Cell Cellular Solids,” Dept. of Aeronautics, Royal Institute of Technology, S-100 44 Stockholm, Sweden, 1998 (submitted).Google Scholar
4. Van der Burg, M.W.D., Shulmeister, V., Van der Giessen, E., Marissen, R., “On the linear Elastic Properties of Regular and Random Open-Cell Foam Models,” Journal of Cellular Plastics, Vol.33, pp. 3154, 1997.Google Scholar
5. Grenestedt, J.L., Tanaka, K., “Influence of Cell Shape Variations on Elastic Stiffness of Closed Cell Cellular Solids,” Dept. of Aeronautics, Royal Institute of Technology, S-100 44 Stockholm, Sweden, 1998 (in preparation).Google Scholar
6. Silva, M.J., Gibson, L.J., “The Effects of Non-periodic Microstructure and Defects on the Compressive Strength of Two-dimensional Cellular Solids,” Int. J. Mech. Sci., Vol.39, No. 5, pp. 549563, 1997.Google Scholar
7. Divinycell, Technical Manual H Grade, DIAB, Box 201, S-312 22 Laholm, Sweden, 1995.Google Scholar
8. Akiyama, S., et al., U.S. Patent 4,713,277, Dec. 15, 1987.Google Scholar
9. Thomson, W. (Kelvin, Lord), “On the Division of Space with Minimum Partitional Area,” Phil.Mag., Vol.24, No. 151, pp. 503514, 1887.Google Scholar
10. Kröner, E., “Berechnung der elastischen Konstanten des Vielkristalls aus den Konstanten des Einkristalls,” Zeitschrift für Physic, Vol.151, pp. 504518, 1958.Google Scholar
11. Grenestedt, J.L., “Effective Elastic Behavior of Some Models for “Perfect” Cellular Solids,” 1998 (to appear in Int. J. Solids Struct.).Google Scholar
12. Hashin, Z., Shtrikman, S., “A Variational Approach to the Theory of the Elastic Behaviour of Multiphase Materials,” J. Mech. Phys. Solids, Vol.11, pp. 127140, 1963.Google Scholar
13. Divinycell, Technical Manual HT Grade, DIAB, Box 201, S-312 22 Laholm, Sweden, 1992.Google Scholar
14. Divinycell, Technical Manual HCP Grade, DIAB, Box 201, S-312 22 Laholm, Sweden, 1992.Google Scholar
15. Sugimura, Y., Meyer, J., He, M.Y., Bart-Smith, H., Grenestedt, J., Evans, A.G., “On the Mechanical Performance of Closed Cell Al Alloy Foams,” Acta mater., Vol.45, No. 12, pp. 52455259, 1997.Google Scholar