Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-hc48f Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-29T07:58:18.609Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Influence of Modifiers on the Pigmentary Properties of Titanium Dioxide

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 February 2013

Marta A. Gleń  and
Barbara U. Grzmil
Marta A. Gleń
Affiliation:
West Pomeranian University of Technology, Szczecin, Institute of Chemical and Environment Engineering, 70-322 Szczecin, Pułaskiego 10, E-mail: mglen@zut.edu.pl
Barbara U. Grzmil
Affiliation:
West Pomeranian University of Technology, Szczecin, Institute of Chemical and Environment Engineering, 70-322 Szczecin, Pułaskiego 10, E-mail: mglen@zut.edu.pl
Get access

Abstract

In the present work modified titanium dioxide products are prepared. The influence of introduced modifiers (phosphorus, potassium, aluminium, and tin) on the photoactivity, optical properties, and phase composition of titanium dioxide is studied. The molar contents of P2O5, K2O, Al2O3, and SnO2 in relation to TiO2 are 0.10, 0.18, 0.24, and 0.08-1.32 mol%, respectively. The research is aimed at obtaining the pigmentary rutile TiO2 with the highest possible photostability and improved optical properties.

Keywords

Tioxideadditives
Type
Articles
Information
MRS Online Proceedings Library (OPL) , Volume 1485: Symposium 7D – Advanced Structural Materials—2012 , 2012 , pp. 59 - 64
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2013 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Inagaki, M., Nakazawa, Y., Hirano, M., Kobayashi, Y. and Toyoda, M., Int. J. Inorg. Mater. 3, 809 (2001).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Karvinen, S., Solid State Sci. 5, 811 (2003).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mills, A. and Le Hunte, S., J. Photochem. Photobiol. A: Chem. 108, 1 (1997).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Diebold, M. P., Surf. Coat. Int. 6, 250 (1995).Google Scholar
Choi, W., Termin, A. and Hoffmann, M. R., J. Phys. Chem. 98, 13669 (1994).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Xu, A. W., Gao, Y. and Liu, H. Q., J. Catal. 207, 151 (2002).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yu, J. C., Lin, J. and Kwok, R. W. M., J. Phys. Chem. B 102, 5094 (1998).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chen, X. and Mao, S. S., Chem. Rev. 107, 2891 (2007).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Di Paola, A., Garcia-Lopez, E., Ikeda, S., Marci, G., Ohtani, B. and Palmisano, L.,Catal. Today 75, 87 (2002).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wilke, K. and Breuer, H. D., J. Photochem. Photobiol. A: Chem. 121, 49 (1999).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rademachers, J. and Heisse, H. P., US Patent 4 917 735, Filed 18 January 1989, Issued 17 April 1990 Google Scholar
Knittel, H., Bauer, R., Liedek, E. and Etzrodt, G.. US Patent 4 844 741, Filed 20 April 1988, Issued 4 July 1989 Google Scholar
Tyler, F. K., Paint Coat. Ind. 16, 32 (2000).Google Scholar
Gleń, M., Grzmil, B., Sreńscek-Nazzal, J. and Kic, B., Chem. Pap. 65, 203 (2011).CrossRefGoogle Scholar