Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-j824f Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-10T10:17:37.822Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The Influence of Stressing at Different Biases on the Electrical and Optical Properties of CdS/CdTe Solar Cells

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 March 2011

S. W. Townsend
Affiliation:
Colorado School of Mines, Dept of Physics 1523 Illinois St. Golden, CO 80401, U.S.A.
T. R. Ohno
Affiliation:
Colorado School of Mines, Dept of Physics 1523 Illinois St. Golden, CO 80401, U.S.A.
V. Kaydanov
Affiliation:
Colorado School of Mines, Dept of Physics 1523 Illinois St. Golden, CO 80401, U.S.A.
A. S. Gilmore
Affiliation:
Colorado School of Mines, Dept of Physics 1523 Illinois St. Golden, CO 80401, U.S.A.
J. D. Beach
Affiliation:
Colorado School of Mines, Dept of Physics 1523 Illinois St. Golden, CO 80401, U.S.A.
R. T. Collins
Affiliation:
Colorado School of Mines, Dept of Physics 1523 Illinois St. Golden, CO 80401, U.S.A.
Get access

Abstract

Cadmium Sulfide/Cadmium Telluride (CdS/CdTe) devices are subject to stress under various biases. Striking differences are observed with the Current-Voltage, and Capacitance- Voltage measurements for cells degraded at 100°C in dark under forward (FB), open circuit (OC), and reverse (RB) biases. RB stress provides the greatest degradation, and the apparent doping density profile shows anomalous behavior at the zero bias depletion width. Thin films of CdS, both doped and undoped, with Cu are characterized with photoluminescence (PL). The PL spectra from the CdS films are correlated with the CdS spectra from stressed devices, revealing that Cu signatures in the CdS layer of stressed devices are a function of stress biasing. Device modeling using AMPS-1D produces IV curves similar to that in RB degraded devices, by only varying the trap level concentration in the CdS layer.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2001

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1. Dobson, K., Visoly-Fischer, I., Hodes, G., and Cahen, D., Sol. Energy Matter. Sol. Cells, 62,3 (May, 2000) 295.Google Scholar
2. Bube, R. H., Photovoltaic Materials (Imperial College Press, London, 1998).Google Scholar
3. Durose, K., Edwards, P. R., and Halliday, D. P., J. Cryst. Growth, 197 (1999) 733.Google Scholar
4. Chou, H. C., Rohatgi, A., Thomas, E. W., Kamra, S., and Bhat, A. K., J. Electrochem. Soc., 142 (1995) 254.Google Scholar
5. Narayanswamy, C., Gessert, T. A., and Asher, S. E., Proceedings of the 15th NCPV Photovoltaics Program Review Meeting, American Institute of Physics Conference Proceedings 462, Eds. Al-Jassim, M., Thornton, J. P. and Gee, J. M. (American Institute of Physics, Woodbury, New York, 1998) p. 248.Google Scholar
6. Chou, H. C., Rohatgi, A., Jokerst, N. M., Thomas, E. W., and Kamra, S., J. Electron. Mater., 25 (1996) 1093.Google Scholar
7. Sebastian, P. J. and Ocampo, M., J. Appl. Phys., 77 (1995) 4548.Google Scholar
8. Kuribayashi, K., Matsumoto, H., Uda, H., Komatsu, Y., Nakano, A., and Ikegami, S., Jpn. J. Appl. Phys., 22 (1983) 1828.Google Scholar
9. Uda, H., Ikegami, S., and Sonomura, H., Sol. Energy Mater. Sol. Cells, 50 (1998) 141.Google Scholar
10. Agata, M., Solid State Communications, 76, 8 (1990) pp. 10611065.Google Scholar
11. Bogdanyuk, N. S., Semiconductors 29, 2 (1995) 181.Google Scholar
12. Raevskii, S. D. et al., Inorganic Materials, 32, 12 (1996) pp. 12621264.Google Scholar
13. Mejia-Garcia, C. et al., Journal of Applied Physics, 86, 6 (Sept. 1999) 3171.Google Scholar
14. AMPS-1D, version 1,0,0,1, written under the direction of S. Fonash at Pennsylvania State University.Google Scholar
15. Fahrenbruch, A. L., CSU Report, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO, March 2000.Google Scholar