Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-g7gxr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-13T02:53:32.218Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Interaction Between Synroc-C and Pure Water or Boom Clay

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 February 2011

Pierre Van Iseghem ,
Wei Jiang ,
Marc Blanchaert ,
Kaye Hart  and
Alexander Lodding
Pierre Van Iseghem
Affiliation:
SCK·CEN, 2400 Mol, Belgium
Wei Jiang
Affiliation:
SCK·CEN, 2400 Mol, Belgium
Marc Blanchaert
Affiliation:
SCK·CEN, 2400 Mol, Belgium
Kaye Hart
Affiliation:
ANSTO, Lucas Heights, NSW, Australia
Alexander Lodding
Affiliation:
Chalmers University, Gothenburg, Sweden
Get access

Abstract

We investigated the interaction between Synroc-C and deionized water or Boom clay disposal media. We used powdered Synroc-C to achieve high SA/V (surface area to volume) conditions (100, 1000, 10000 m-1). The temperature was 90°C. Reaction progress up to 10+6 days/mi was reached. We conclude that dissolution in DW is mainly controlled by initial ion exchange, followed by matrix dissolution. In both Boom clay media (a 500 g/l and a 2000 g/l clay/claywater mixture) matrix dissolution is dominating. The depletion depth of the main Synroc constituent Ti is below 250 nm in the clay media, and below 2 nm in DW after 110 days corrosion at 100 m-1. The corrosion rates are very small, though we cannot present meaningful values. The effect of Boom clay is mainly to increase the solubility of Ti, Zr and the rare earths in solution.

Type
Research Article
Information
MRS Online Proceedings Library (OPL) , Volume 412: Symposium V – Scientific Basis for Nuclear Waste Management XIX , 1995 , 305
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1996

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Ringwood, A.E., Kesson, S.E., Reeve, K.D., Levins, D.M. and Ramm, E.J., in Radioactive Waste Forms for the Future, edited by Lutze, W. and Ewing, R.C. (North Holland Publishers, 1988), pp 233–334 Google Scholar
2. Van Miegroet, J., in Geological Disposal of Spent Fuel and High-Level and Alpha Bearing Wastes, Published by IAEA, STI/PUB/907, 1993, pp 101–108 Google Scholar
3. Marivoet, J., in Updating 1990, BLG 634, 1992 Google Scholar
4. Van Iseghem, P., Berghman, K., Lemmens, K., Timmermans, W., Lian Wang, EUR 13607, 1992 Google Scholar
5. Iseghem, P.Van, Labat, S. and Cornélis, B., in In-Situ Testing of Radioactive Waste Forms and Engineered Barriers, edited by McMenamin, T., preprint EUR 15629.Google Scholar
6. Lodding, A., Clark, D.E., Engström, E.U., Odelius, H., Schuhmacher, M., Wicks, G.G. and Zoitos, B.K., in Ceramics Today- Tomorrow's Ceramics”, Edited by Vincenzini, P. (Elsevier Publ), pp 3121–3129, 1991 Google Scholar
7. Smith, K.L., Hart, K.P., Lumpkin, G.R., McGlinn, P., Lam, P. and Blackford, M.B., in Scientific Basis for Nuclear Waste Management XIV, Edited by Abrajano, T. and Johnson, L., Mat. Res. Soc. Symp. Proc. 212 (1991), pp. 167–174Google Scholar
8. Van Iseghem, P., Lemmens, K., Aertsens, M. and Put, M., in GEOVAL '94. Validation through Model Testing, OECD Publ, pp 203–217, 1995 Google Scholar