Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-f46jp Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-01-15T06:29:00.567Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Interface Transition Zone and the Elastic Modulus of Cement-Based Composites

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 February 2011

Peter I. Simeonov  and
S.H. Ahmad
Peter I. Simeonov
Affiliation:
Department of Civil Engineering, NC State University, Raleigh, NC 27695
S.H. Ahmad
Affiliation:
Department of Civil Engineering, NC State University, Raleigh, NC 27695
Get access

Abstract

The influence of the Interface Transition Zone (ITZ) on the elastic modulus of concrete is demonstrated as a divergence of the experimental data from the general trend of the theoretical Hashin-Shtrikman bounds. This divergence is well related to the W/C of the composite. With reduction of W/C the influence of ITZ decreases and for values close to 0.4 and lower it is insignificant.

The formation of the ITZ is characterized by a transfer of water from the matrix to the surface of the aggregates. As a result of this a highly porous ITZ is formed while the matrix remains with a reduced porosity. This process can also be described as a transfer of material properties. For some compositions the balance of this transfer can approach zero. The imbalance in this process is more pronounced at higher W/C.

The effect of Interface Transition Zone can be successfully simulated by the help of recently derived Hashin's variational bounds for two-phase composites with imperfect interfaces.

Type
Research Article
Information
MRS Online Proceedings Library (OPL) , Volume 370: Symposia Va/Vb – Microstructure of Cement-Based Systems/Bonding and Interfaces in Cement... , 1994 , 397
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1995

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Hashin, Z. and Shtrikman, J., J.Mech.Phys.Solids, 11, 127 (1963).Google Scholar
2. Hashin, Z., J.Appl.Mech., 50, 481 (1983).Google Scholar
3. Mandel, J. and Dantu, P., Ann. Ponts Chaussees, 133, 115 (1963).Google Scholar
4. Watt, J.P. and O'Connell, R.J., Phys.Earth Planet.Inter., 21, 359 (1980).Google Scholar
5. Monteiro, P.G.M., Cem.Con.Res., 21, 947 (1991).Google Scholar
6. Nilsen, A.U. and Monteiro, P.J.M., Cem.Con.Res., 23, 147 (1993).Google Scholar
7. Nilsen, A.U. and Monteiro, P.J.M., Cem.Con.Res., 24, 194 (1994).Google Scholar
8. Cohen, M.D., Goldman, A. and Chen, W.-F., Cem.Con.Res. 24, 95, (1994)Google Scholar
9. Hirsch, T.J., ACI Journal, 59, 427 (1962).Google Scholar
10. Counto, U.J., Mag.Con.Res., 16, 129 (1964).Google Scholar
11. Anson, M. and Newman, K., Mag.Con.Res., 18, 115 (1966).Google Scholar
12. Stock, A.F., Hannant, D.J. and Williams, R.I.T., Mag.Con.Res., 31, 225 (1979).Google Scholar
13. Simeonov, P.I., Ahmad, S.H., Cem.Con.Res. (in press) (1995)Google Scholar
14. Zimmerman, R.M., Mech.Res.Commun., 19 (6), 563, (1992)Google Scholar
15. Hashin, Z., J.Mech.Phys.Solids, 40, 767, (1992)Google Scholar
16. Hashin, Z., J.Mech.Phys.Solids, 39, 745, (1991)Google Scholar