Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gbm5v Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-28T06:18:18.325Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Interfacial Characterization of Multiple Layer Coatings on Thermoplastic Olefins (TPO)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 February 2011

Aaron M Forster
Affiliation:
aaron.forster@nist.gov, National Institute of Standards and Technology, Building and Fire Research Laboratory, 100 Bureau Dr., Gaithersburg, MD, 20899, United States, 301-975-8701
Chris A. Michaels
Affiliation:
chris.michaels@nist.gov, National Institute of Standards and Technology, Surface and Microanalysis Science Division, 100 Bureau Dr., Gaithersburg, MD, 20899, United States
Justin Lucas
Affiliation:
justin.lucas@nist.gov, National Institute of Standards and Technology, Materials and Construction Research Division, 100 Bureau Dr., Gaithersburg, MD, 20899, United States
Lipiin Sung
Affiliation:
lipiin@nist.gov, National Institute of Standards and Technology, Materials and Construction Research Division, 100 Bureau Dr., Gaithersburg, MD, 20899, United States
Get access

Abstract

Thermoplastic olefins (TPO) have made significant inroads as polymeric materials for interior and exterior automotive parts. Spray applied chlorinated polyolefins (CPO) are often used to improve paint adhesion to the low surface energy TPO substrates. The penetration of the CPO into the substrate is difficult to quantify, but is critical to achieving a good paint/TPO bond. The interphase between each layer in a coated TPO coupon was investigated using a combination of instrumented indentation and confocal Raman microscopy. The degree of CPO interpenetration was Thermoplastic olefins (TPO) have made significant inroads as polymeric materials for interior and exterior automotive parts. Spray applied chlorinated polyolefins (CPO) are often used to improve paint adhesion to the low surface energy TPO substrates. The penetration of the CPO into the substrate is difficult to quantify, but is critical to achieving a good paint/TPO bond. The interphase between each layer in a coated TPO coupon was investigated using a combination of instrumented indentation and confocal Raman microscopy. The degree of CPO interpenetration was altered by using three different CPOs exposed to two different manufacturing methods for the same TPO and base/clear coat system. It was found that the interfaces, CPO/base coat or CPO/TPO, were chemically and mechanically sharp at the 1 μm lateral resolution of both techniques. A gradient in the modulus through the thickness of the clear coat was observed using instrumented indentation.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2008

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Morris, H. R, Munroe, B., Ryntz, R. A, Treado, P. J, Langmuir 14 2426 (1998).Google Scholar
2 Morris, H. R, Turner, J. F II, Munro, B., Ryntz, R. A, Treado, P. J, Langmuir 15 2961 (1999).Google Scholar
3 Ma, Y., Winnik, M. A, Yaneff, P. V, Ryntz, R. A, JCT Research 2 407 (2005).Google Scholar
4 Ryntz, R. A, J. of Vinyl & Additive Technology 3 295 (1997).Google Scholar
5 Ryntz, R. A, JCT Research 3 3 (2006).Google Scholar
6 Burnett, D. J, Thielmann, F., Ryntz, R. A, JCT Research 4 211 (2007).Google Scholar
7 Mirabella, F. M, Dioh, N., Zimba, C. G, Polymer Engineering and Science 40 2000 (2000).Google Scholar
8 Tang, H., Martin, D. C, J. of Mat. Sci. 37 4783 (2002).Google Scholar
9 Lawniczak, J. E, Williams, K. A, Germinario, L. T, JCT Research 2 399 (2005).Google Scholar
10 Drzal, P.L, Sung, L-P, Brintz, D., Ryntz, R. A, in International Coatings for Plastics Symposium Proceedings June 6-8, (2005).Google Scholar
11 Fischer-Cripps, A. C., Nanoindentation, Springer-Verlag, New York, 2004 Google Scholar
12 Sneddon, I. N, Int. J. Engng Sci. 3 47 (1965).Google Scholar
13 Oliver, W. C, Pharr, G. M, J. Mater. Res. 7 1564 (1992).Google Scholar
14 VanLandingham, M. R, Journal of Research of the National Institute of Standards and Technology 108 249 (2003).Google Scholar
15 Gu, X., Michaels, C.A, Nguyen, D., Jean, Y.C, Martin, J.W and Nguyen, T., Appl. Surf. Sci. 252 5168 (2006).Google Scholar
16 Tadokoro, H., Kobayashi, M., Ukita, M., Yasufuku, K., Murahashi, S., and Torii, T., J. Chem. Phys. 42 1432 (1965).Google Scholar
17 Rosasco, G.J and Blaha, J.J, Appl. Spec. 34 140 (1980).Google Scholar
18 Johnson, K. L., Contact Mechanics Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, (1985).Google Scholar
19 Hui, C. Y, Jagota, A., Lin, Y. Y, Kramer, E. J, Langmuir 18 1394 (2002).Google Scholar
20 Duskova-Smrckova, M., Dusek, K., J. Mat. Sci. 37 4733 (2002).Google Scholar
21 Flosbach, B., Macromol. Symp. 187 503 (2002).Google Scholar