Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-t5tsf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-14T18:13:11.852Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Investigation of Antimicrobial Peptide Salts: Efficacy and Solubility in Surfactant Solutions for Latex Systems

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 February 2011

Douglas Wicks
Affiliation:
douglas.wicks@usm.edu, The University of Southern Mississippi, Box 10076, Hattiesburg, MS, 39406, United States
Alicyn M Rhoades
Affiliation:
alicyn.haney@usm.edu, The University of Southern Mississippi, United States
John S Williamson
Affiliation:
mcjsw@olemiss.edu, United States
Bruhaspathy Miriyala
Affiliation:
bru@olemiss.edu
Get access

Abstract

The study and application of antimicrobial peptides is a growing niche field in the areas of pharmaceutics and medicinal chemistry. As a result, the majority of testing and development is completed under in vitro conditions. The use of synthetically derived antimicrobial peptides in applications outside the medical realm is a relatively untapped field, with the significance of interactions between antimicrobial oligopeptides and the ingredients of polymer systems being largely unknown. Water-based polymer coatings systems are attractive targets for microbial invasion because of their inherent material properties. Water-based polymer latex coatings contain a number of components which aide in stabilization and coalescence of the polymer particles, such as surfactants and polymeric cellulose-derived molecules, with several types of molecular structures existing for each. Microbes are able to flourish within the water phase of the latexes while taking sustenance from these dispersion components, resulting in a loss of properties commonly known as ‘spoilage’. This work addresses the impact of formulation variables, specifically surfactant structure, on the solution and antimicrobial behavior of a model antimicrobial oligopeptides through the use of HT absorbance measurements.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2006

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Winkowski, K. ECJ, 1, 87 (2001).Google Scholar
2 Rhoades, A.; Elasri, M.; Wicks, D. Journal of Coatings Technology Research, 2, 607 (2005).Google Scholar
3 Blondelle, S. Houghten, R. Trends in Biotechnology 14, 60 (1996).Google Scholar
4 Jing, W, Hunter, H.N., Hagel, J. & Vogel, H.J. J. Peptide Res., 61, 219 (2003).Google Scholar
5 Gillat, J. Pigment & Resin Technology, 25, 4 (1996).Google Scholar
6 Holmberg, K., Jonsson, B., Kronberg, B., Lindman, B. Surfactants and Polymers in Aqueous Solution, 2nd ed. (John Wiley and Sons, LTD, England, 2003) p. 306.Google Scholar
7 Houghten, R. A., Pinilla, C., Blondelle, S. E., Appel, J. R., Dooley, C. T., and Cuervo, J. H. Nature, 354, 84 (1991).Google Scholar
8 Papo, N., Oren, Z, Pag, U., Sahl§, H., and Shai, Y. J. Biol. Chem., 277, 33913 (2002).Google Scholar
9. Jones, M.; Brass, A. Food Polymers, Gels and Colloids. Edited by Dickinson, E. (Royal Society of Chemistry, Cambridge, 1991) p. 65.Google Scholar
10. Dickinson, E. Proteins in Solution and at Interfaces. Edited by Goddard, E. and Ananthapadmanabhan, K. (CRC Press, Boca Raton, 1993) p. 295.Google Scholar
11. Nishikido, N.; Takahara, T.; Kobayashi, H.; Tanaka, M. Bull. Chem. Soc. Jpn 55, 3085 (1982).Google Scholar
12. Sjogren, H.; Ericsson, C. A; Evenas, J.; Ulvenlund, S. Biophysical Journal 89(6), 4219, (2005).Google Scholar