Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-m6dg7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-10T09:21:02.218Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Junction Properties of Metal/SrTiO3 Systems

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 February 2011

Takashi Shimizu  and
Hideyo Okushi
Takashi Shimizu
Affiliation:
Electrotechnical Laboratory, 1-1-4 Umezono, Tsukuba, Ibaraki 305-0045, Japan
Hideyo Okushi
Affiliation:
Electrotechnical Laboratory, 1-1-4 Umezono, Tsukuba, Ibaraki 305-0045, Japan
Get access

Abstract

Electrical properties of Nb-doped SrTiO3 (STO:Nb) Schottky barrier (SB) junctions have been investigated in detail for a comprehensive understanding of metal/oxide interfaces. Using a high-purity ozone surface treatment, rectification ratio over 9th order of magnitude has been successfully obtained, while without the surface treatment, anomalous large reverse bias leak currents were observed in the current-voltage characteristic of the junctions. The X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) shows that carbon contamination which adsorbed the STO:Nb surface in air, induces surface states in the band gap of the STO:Nb, which probably originate the large reverse bias leak currents of the metal/STO:Nb junctions. Thus we present importance, of surface treatment for oxides to obtain controllability and reproducibility of the electrical properties of the oxide devices. Photocapacitance spectroscopy has been performed to investigate deep levels due to bulk defects and impurities in the Au/STO:Nb junctions. The photocapacitance spectra clearly indicate existence of the deep levels in the Au/STO:Nb and the concentration of the deep levels were of the order of 1013∼1015 cm−3. These values are too low to affect the Fermi level pinning at the interface if the deep levels exist in the near surface region of the bulk STO:Nb. We have shown some interesting electrical properties, characteristic of the SB junction of the dielectric oxide compared with that of the conventional semiconductor's. The schematic band diagram of the Au/STO:Nb junction with the intrinsic low permittivity layer at the interface has been proposed, which explains all the characteristic electrical properties. Considering the chemical trend of the SB height (SBH) estimated from the J-V results, we have pointed out the importance of the metal reactivity for understanding the formation mechanism of the SBH.

Type
Research Article
Information
MRS Online Proceedings Library (OPL) , Volume 623: Symposium U – Materials Science of Novel Oxide-Based Electronics , 2000 , 97
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2000

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Shimizu, T., Okushi, H., Appl. Phys. Lett. 67, 1411 (1995).Google Scholar
2 Shimizu, T., Okushi, H., J. Appl. Phys. 85, 7244 (1999).Google Scholar
3 Almost the same junction properties were observed for both types of substrates, while the RHEED patterns and the AFM images showed slightly different surface reconstruction and surface morphologies.Google Scholar
4 Goldschmigt, D., Tuller, H. L., Phys. Rev. B 35, 4360 (1987).Google Scholar
5 Shimizu, T., Gotoh, N., Shinozaki, N., Okushi, H., Appl. Surf. Sci. 117/118, 400 (1997).Google Scholar
6 Rhoderick, E. H., Williams, R. H., Metal-Semiconductor Contacts, 2nd ed., (Oxford, New York, 1988).Google Scholar
7 Cleaning condition of the STO:Nb substrate was slightly different from the conventional ozone cleaning that described in the experimental section. In case of the STO:Nb, whose XP spectra are shown in fig. 3 and fig. 4, substrate surface was cleaned at room temperature under 800 Pa 03 with ultraviolet (UV) light. However, results of the XP spectra are almost same as those of the conventional ozone cleaning, which has been already published in: Shimizu, T., Okushi, H., Bull. Electrotech. Lab. 63, 5 (1999).Google Scholar
8 Okushi, H., Tokumaru, Y., Jpn. J. Appl. Phys. 20, 261 (1980).Google Scholar
9 Okushi, H., Phil. Mag. B52, 33 (1985).Google Scholar
10 Bardeen, J., Phys. Rev. 71, 717 (1947).Google Scholar
11 Zhou, C., Newns, D. M., J. Appl. Phys. 82, 3081 (1997).Google Scholar
12 Bickel, N., Schmidt, G., Heunz, K., Müller, K., Phys. Rev. Lett. 62, 2009 (1989).Google Scholar
13 Hikita, T., Hanada, T., Kudo, M., Kawai, M., J. Vac. Sci. Technol. A11, 2649 (1993).Google Scholar
14 Prade, J., Schröder, U., Kress, W., Wetts, F. W. de, Kulkarni, A. D., J. Phys.: Condens. Matter 5, 1 (1993).Google Scholar
15 Ravikumar, V., Wolf, D., Dravid, V. P., Phys. Rev. Lett. 74, 960 (1995).Google Scholar
16 Mönch, W., Semiconductor Surfaces and Interfaces, 2nd ed. (Springer, 1978).Google Scholar