Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-d8cs5 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-02-05T21:29:13.098Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Laser Annealing of Te-Implanted III-V Semiconductors Studied by Mossbauer Spectroscopy

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 February 2011

M. Van Rossum ,
I. Dezsi ,
G. Langouche ,
J. De Bruyn  and
R. Coussement
M. Van Rossum
Affiliation:
Instituut voor Kern– en Stralingsfysika, Leuven University, Belgium
I. Dezsi
Affiliation:
Instituut voor Kern– en Stralingsfysika, Leuven University, Belgium
G. Langouche
Affiliation:
Instituut voor Kern– en Stralingsfysika, Leuven University, Belgium
J. De Bruyn
Affiliation:
Instituut voor Kern– en Stralingsfysika, Leuven University, Belgium
R. Coussement
Affiliation:
Instituut voor Kern– en Stralingsfysika, Leuven University, Belgium
Get access

Abstract

The laser annealing behaviour of Te-implanted GaAs, GaSb, GaP and InP has been studied by Mössbauer Spectroscopy. The spectra of the as-implanted samples are characterized by a quadrupole split multiplet, showing that the Te ions come to rest at non-substitutional lattice sites. The laser annealing is shown to shift the implanted impurities towards substitutional positions. The efficiency of the laser annealing procedure is very similar for all lattices under study.

Type
Research Article
Information
MRS Online Proceedings Library (OPL) , Volume 3: Symposium – Nuclear and Electron Resonance Spectroscopies Applied to Materials Science , 1980 , 359
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1981

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1. Weyer, G., Petersen, J.W., Damgaard, S., Nielsen, H.L. and Heinemeier, J., Phys. Rev. Lett. 44, 155 (1980).Google Scholar
2. Weyer, G., Damgaard, S., Petersen, J.W. and Heinemeier, J., J. Phys. C13, L181 (1980).Google Scholar
3. Golovchenko, J.A. and Venkatesan, T.N.C., Appl. Phys. Lett. 32, 147 (1978).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
4. Pianetta, P.A., Stolte, C.A. and Hansen, J.L., to be published in Appl. Phys. Lett. Google Scholar
5. De bruyn, J., Coussement, R., Dézsi, I., Langouche, G. and Van Rossum, M., contribution to the “Vth International Conference on Hyperfine Interactions” Berlin July 1980.Google Scholar
6. Dézsi, I. et al. , to be published.Google Scholar
7. Shiu, B.K., Park, Y.S. and Ehret, J.E., in: Ion Implantation in Semiconductors 1976, Chernow, F., Borders, J.A. and Brice, D.K. eds. (Plenum Press, New York 1977) pp. 107.Google Scholar
8. Sealy, B.Y., Kular, S.S., Stephens, K.G., Sadana, D. and Booker, G.R., in: Proceedings of the International Conference on ion beam modification of materials, Gyulai, J., Lohner, T. and Pasztor, E. eds. (Budapest 1978) pp. 751.Google Scholar
9. De bruyn, J., Langouche, G., Van Rossum, M., de Potter, M. and Coussement, R., Phys. Lett. 73A, 356 (1979).CrossRefGoogle Scholar