Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-g4j75 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-01-28T10:21:02.193Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Life cycle analysis of mortars and its environmental impact

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 February 2011

Antonia Moropoulou ,
Christopher Koroneos ,
Maria Karoglou ,
Eleni Aggelakopoulou ,
Asterios Bakolas  and
Aris Dompros
Antonia Moropoulou
Affiliation:
amoropul@central.ntua.gr, National Technical University of Athens, School of Chemical Engineering, 9, Iroon Politechniou Str., Zografou, Athens, 15780, Greece, +30 210 772 3276, +30 210 772 3215
Christopher Koroneos
Affiliation:
koroneos@aix.meng.auth.gr, Greece
Maria Karoglou
Affiliation:
margo@central.ntua.gr, Greece
Eleni Aggelakopoulou
Affiliation:
lagela@central.ntua.gr, Greece
Asterios Bakolas
Affiliation:
abakolas@mail.ntua.gr, Greece
Aris Dompros
Affiliation:
adompros@aix.meng.auth.gr, Greece
Get access

Abstract

Over the years considerable research has been conducted on masonry mortars regarding their compatibility with under restoration structures. The environmental dimension of these materials may sometimes be a prohibitive factor in the selection of these materials. Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) is a tool that can be used to assess the environmental impact of the materials. LCA can be a very useful tool in the decision making for the selection of appropriate restoration structural material. In this work, a comparison between traditional type of mortars and modern ones (cement-based) is attempted. Two mortars of traditional type are investigated: with aerial lime binder, with aerial lime and artificial pozzolanic additive and one with cement binder. The LCA results indicate that the traditional types of mortars are more sustainable compared to cementbased mortars. For the impact assessment, the method used is Eco-indicator 95

Keywords

environmentally benignmixtureenvironmentally protective
Type
Research Article
Information
MRS Online Proceedings Library (OPL) , Volume 895: Symposium G – Life-Cycle Analysis Tools for “Green” Materials and Process Selection , 2005 , 0895-G06-02
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2006

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

[1] Moropoulou, A., Bakolas, A., Moundoulas, P., Aggelakopoulou, E., Anagnostopoulou, S., Cem. and Concr. Compos. 27, 295–300 (2005).Google Scholar
[2] Baumann, H., Decision Making and Life Cycle Assessment, Licentiate thesis. Göteborg:Chalmers University of Technology. Technical Environmental Planning Report 1995:4Google Scholar
[3] Tillman, A. M., Environmental Impact Assessment Review. 20, 113–123 (2000).Google Scholar
[4] International Standardization Organization, Environmental Management—Life Cycle Assessment—Principles and Framework, International standard ISO 14040, 1st ed. 1997-06-15. Geneva: ISO, 1997.Google Scholar
[5] Erlandssona, M., Borg, M., Building and Environment. 38, 919–938 (2003).Google Scholar
[6] BYKR, The significant environmental aspects in building sector. Swedish Building Eco-Cycle Council (BYKR), Stockholm, 2000, Available at: http://www.kretloppsradet.se.Google Scholar
[7] Brezet, H., Van Hemel, C., editors. “ECODESIGN: A promising approach to sustainable production and consumption”, Paris: UNEP, United Nations Publications, ISBN 92-807-1631-X, 1997.Google Scholar
[8] ISO. Environmental labels and declarations—Type III environmental declarations (ISO/TR:14025:2000(E)).Google Scholar
[9] European Union. EMAS 2, European Union Commission Regulation (EC) No 761/2001.Google Scholar
[10] ISO. Environmental management systems—Specification with guidance for use (ISO:14001:1996).Google Scholar
[11] Moropoulou, A., Bakolas, A., Aggelakopoulou, E., Cement and Concrete Research, 31, 633–639 (2001).Google Scholar
[12] Klimesch, D. S., Ray, A., Thermochim. Acta, 307, 167 (1997).Google Scholar
[13] SETAC, Society of Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry, Guidelines for Life-Cycle Assessment, a “Code of Practice”, Brussels, Belgium, 1993.Google Scholar
[14] Heijungs, R. et al. , Milieugerichtelevenscyclusanalyses van produkten, handleiding [Environmental life cycle assessments, a manual], October 1992; Leiden; 1992; commissioned by the Dutch National Programme for Research into Waste Recycling (NOH), in collaboration with CML, TNO and B&G.Google Scholar