Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-v9fdk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-11T08:27:15.243Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Low Temperature Annealing Effects on Magnetron Sputtered Ni(V)/Al Reactive Coatings

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 February 2011

Matthew P. Blickley
Affiliation:
mpb5005@psu.edu, Pennsylvania State University, United States
Nicholas A. Soroka
Affiliation:
Nicholas.Soroka@usma.edu, US Military Academy, United States
John Derek Demaree
Affiliation:
jdemaree@arl.army.mil, Army Research Laboratory, United States
James K. Hirvonen
Affiliation:
hirvonen@arl.army.mil, Army Research Laboratory, United States
Peter G. Dehmer
Affiliation:
pdehmer@arl.army.mil, Army Research Laboratory, United States
Get access

Abstract

Reactive nanofoil coatings of magnetron-sputtered aluminum and nickel/vanadium bilayers were characterized for reliable debonding of segmented carbon composite or metallic structures to be used in future Army applications. We determined the initiation energies of multilayer stacks by discharging an electric spark from a fixed capacitor bank and varying DC voltage before and after low temperature annealing, which resulted in varying amounts of interfacial interdiffusion observable by Rutherford backscattering spectrometry (RBS). The propagation velocity of the reaction was also measured using high speed video photography. Significant increases in initiation energy and decreasing propagation velocities were observed with increasing anneal times and temperatures, in agreement with the RBS results and existing literature discussion of reaction mechanisms. Initiation sensitivity and propagation velocity were both impacted by varying the stoichiometric ratio of Al and Ni/V, and the propagation rate was also affected by the nature of the substrate. These results allow for the optimization of both reliable initiation and long term, low temperature storage stability of the final reactive coatings for debonding applications.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2006

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Barbee, T. W. Jr., and Weihs, T. P., US Patent 5,538,795, July 23, 1996 Google Scholar
2 Mann, A. B., et al. , J. Appl. Phys., 82 (3) (1997) 11781188 Google Scholar
3 Wang, J., et al. , Appl. Phys. Letters, 83 (19) (2003) 39873989 Google Scholar
4 Wang, J., et al. , J. Appl. Phys., 95 (1) (2004) 248256 Google Scholar
5 Duckham, A., et al. , J. Appl. Phys., 96 (4) (2004) 23362342 Google Scholar
6 Swiston, A. J., et al. , Acta Mater., 53 (13) (2005) 37133719 Google Scholar
7 Chin, E. S. C., Mat. Sci. Eng. A, 259 (2) (1999) 155161 Google Scholar
8 Minnicino, M. A., et al. , Proc. of 24th Army Science Conference, Orlando, FL, Nov 29– Dec 2, 2004 Google Scholar
9 Blobaum, K. J., et al. , Acta Mater., 51 (13) (2003) 38713884 Google Scholar
10 Bassani, M. H. da Silva, et al. , Scripta Mater., 37 (2) (1997) 227232 Google Scholar
11 Jayaraman, S., et al. , J. Appl. Phys., 86 (2) (1999) 800809 Google Scholar
12 Gavans, A. J., et al. , J. Appl. Phys., 87 (3) (2000) 12551263 Google Scholar
13 Besnoin, E., et al. , J. Appl. Phys., 92 (9) (2002) 54745481 Google Scholar
14 Jayaraman, S., et al. , Combustion and Flame, 124 (2001) 178194 Google Scholar