Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-s22k5 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-01-28T14:16:42.692Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Magnetron Sputter Heteroepitaxy of Si1-x.Gex/Si(001): The Evolution of the Cross-Hatched Surface

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 February 2011

B. Vögeli ,
M. Kummer  and
H. Von Känel
B. Vögeli
Affiliation:
Laboratorium für Festkörperphysik, ETH Hönggerberg, CH-8093 Zürich
M. Kummer
Affiliation:
Laboratorium für Festkörperphysik, ETH Hönggerberg, CH-8093 Zürich
H. Von Känel
Affiliation:
Laboratorium für Festkörperphysik, ETH Hönggerberg, CH-8093 Zürich
Get access

Abstract

The surface step structure of step graded Si1-xGex buffers was investigated by scanning tunneling microscopy (STM). On pseudomorphically grown samples, single atomic steps were found, with the 2×8 reconstruction indicating Ge segregation. Upon strain relaxation, surface slips and the development of the cross-hatched surface takes place. Here, close to the surface slips, the step structure was found to consist of double height DA steps. This feature is not simply kinematically driven step bunching but can be attributed to the anisotropic strain field on the surface and to the Ge segregation. Analysis of STM cross-sections were taken to estimate the relaxation of our samples. The obtained values agree well with x-ray measurements. The relaxation is found to depend exponentially on the temperature, as theoretically expected.

Type
Research Article
Information
MRS Online Proceedings Library (OPL) , Volume 533: Symposium FF – Epitaxy & Applications of Si-Based Heterostructures , 1998 , 203
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1998

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

[1] For a review see, e. g. Schäffler, F., Semicond. Sci. Technol. 12, 1515 (1997)Google Scholar
[2] Beanland, R., Dunstan, D. J., and Goodhew, P. J., Advances in Physics 45, 87 (1996)Google Scholar
[3] LeGoues, F. K., Meyerson, B. S., Morar, J. F., and Kirchner, P. D., J. Appl. Phys. 71, 396 (1993)Google Scholar
[4] Li, J. H., Holy, V., Bauer, G., and Schäffler, F., J. Appl. Phys. 82, 2881 (1997)Google Scholar
[5] Feenstra, R. M. et al., J. Vac. Sci. Technol. B 13(4), 1608 (1995)Google Scholar
[6] Vögeli, B., Zimmermann, S., and Känel, H. von, Thin Solid Films, in pressGoogle Scholar
[7] Vögeli, B., Kummer, M., and Känel, H. von, presented at the 1998 MRS Spring Meeting, San Francisco, CA, 1998 (to be published)Google Scholar
[8] Knall, J. and Pethica, J. B., Surf. Sci. 265, 156 (1992)Google Scholar
[9] People, R. and Bean, J. C., Appl. Phys. Lett. 47, 322 (1985)Google Scholar
[10]The misorientation of the substrates was 0.07°. We therefore would expect an average terrace width 〈L〉 of 110 nm. The measured terrace width of 16 nm indicates that the local misorientation is different.Google Scholar
[11] Wu, Fang and Lagally, M. G., Phys. Rev. Lett. 75, 2534 (1995)Google Scholar
[12] Lutz, M. A., Feenstra, R. M., LeGoues, F. K., Mooney, P. M., and Chu, J. O., Appl. Phys. Lett. 66, 724 (1995)Google Scholar
[13] Houghton, D. C., J. Appl. Phys. 70, 2136 (1991)Google Scholar
[14] Dodson, B. W. and Tsao, J. Y., Appl. Phys. Lett. 51, 1325 (1987)Google Scholar