Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-ndw9j Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-10T08:48:43.989Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Mechanical Behavior and Cavitation in Commercial and High Purity Zn-22% Al

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  16 February 2011

Kyung-Tae Park ,
James C. Earthman  and
Farghalli A. Mohamed
Kyung-Tae Park
Affiliation:
Materials Section, Department of Mechanical Engineering, University of California Irvine, CA 92717
James C. Earthman
Affiliation:
Materials Section, Department of Mechanical Engineering, University of California Irvine, CA 92717
Farghalli A. Mohamed
Affiliation:
Materials Section, Department of Mechanical Engineering, University of California Irvine, CA 92717
Get access

Abstract

An investigation was conducted on the superplastic Zn-22% Al alloy to examine the effect of impurity level on mechanical behavior and cavitation in the alloy. In conducting the investigation, three grades of Zn-22% Al containing different levels of impurities (6 ppm, 100 ppm, and 180 ppm) were used. The results show that the deformation behavior of Zn- 22% Al at low stresses is influenced by the impurity level of the alloy, and that the extent of cavitation increases with increasing impurity content. These two findings lend support to the concept of attributing low-stress superplastic deformation to strong impurity segregation at boundaries.

Type
Research Article
Information
MRS Online Proceedings Library (OPL) , Volume 196: Symposium T – Superplasticity in Metals, Ceramics, and Intermetallics , 1990 , 45
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1990

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1. Kashyap, B.P. and Mukherjee, A.K., Res. Mechanica. 17, 293 (1986).Google Scholar
2. Pilling, J. and Ridley, N., Res. Mechanica. 23, 31 (1988).Google Scholar
3. Miller, D.A. and Langdon, T.G., Metall. Trans. 9A, 1688 (1978).Google Scholar
4. Chaudhury, P.K. and Mohamed, F.A., Acta Metall. 36, 1099 (1988).Google Scholar
5. Chaudhury, P.K., Sivaramakrishnan, V., and Mohamed, F.A., Metall. Trans. 19 2741 (1988).Google Scholar
6. Mohamed, F.A. and Langdon, T.G., Acta Metall. 23, 117 (1975).Google Scholar
7. Mohamed, F.A., Shei, S.A., and Langdon, T.G., Acta Metall. 23, 1443 (1975).Google Scholar
8. Mohamed, F.A., Ahmed, M.M.I., and Langdon, T.G., Metall. Trans. 8A, 933 (1977).Google Scholar
9. Ashby, M.F. and Verrall, R.A., Acta Metall. 21, 149 (1973).Google Scholar
10. Gittus, J.H., J. Eng. Mater. Technol. 99, 244 (1977).Google Scholar
11. Gifkins, R.C., Metall. Trans. 7A, 1225 (1976).Google Scholar
12. Mohamed, F.A., J. Mater. Sci., 18, 582 (1983).Google Scholar
13. Nagy, S., Vértes, A., Homonnay, Z. and Murgás, L., Acta Metall. 35, 735 (1987).Google Scholar