Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-lnqnp Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-29T13:39:33.915Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The methodology followed in Belgium to investigate the compatibility with geological disposal of Eurobitum bituminized intermediate-level radioactive waste

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 February 2011

Elie Valcke ,
An Marien  and
Maarten Van Geet
Elie Valcke
Affiliation:
W&D Expert Group, SCK•CEN, Boeretang 200, 2400 Mol, Belgium
An Marien
Affiliation:
W&D Expert Group, SCK•CEN, Boeretang 200, 2400 Mol, Belgium
Maarten Van Geet
Affiliation:
ONDRAF/NIRAS, Avenue des Arts – Kunstlaan 14, 1210 Brussels
Get access

Abstract

In Belgium, Eurobitum intermediate-level long-lived bituminized radioactive waste containing large amounts of NaNO3, which is a hygroscopic and soluble salt, is to be disposed of in an underground repository in a geologically stable clay formation. The Boom Clay is studied as a potential host formation because of its favourable properties to limit and delay the migration of the leached radionuclides and other contaminants (heavy metals, NaNO3, organic molecules) to the biosphere. The emplacement of the bituminized waste will induce multiple processes that could have a significant effect on the key properties of the clay. Because several of these processes are interdependent, the study of the compatibility of Eurobitum with geological disposal is complex. To structure the research and to identify possible knowledge gaps, the Belgian Radioactive Waste Management Agency ONDRAF/NIRAS developed a new methodology based on safety functions and safety statements. In this paper, this methodology is briefly explained, with reference to the disposal of Eurobitum. Experimental results obtained at the Belgian Nuclear Research Centre SCK•CEN are presented and discussed in the light of the safety functions and safety statements approach. The importance of the interdependence of the processes is highlighted. Special attention is given to the evolution of the disposal design as a result of the improved understanding of key processes.

Type
Research Article
Information
MRS Online Proceedings Library (OPL) , Volume 1193: Scientific Basis for Nuclear Waste Management XXXIII , 2009 , 105
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2009

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Eshrich, H., EUROCHEMIC Report 80-14, Mol-Dessel, Belgium (1980).Google Scholar
2 M. De Craen, Wang, L., Geet, M. Van and Moors, H., Scientific Report SCK•CEN-BLG-990, SCK•CEN, Mol, Belgium (2004).Google Scholar
3 Mallants, D., Marivoet, J., and Sillen, X., J. Nucl. Mat. 298, p. 125–135 (2001).Google Scholar
4 Valcke, E., Sneyers, A., and Iseghem, P. Van, Proc. of Radwaste Bituminization Conf., June 29th – July 2nd, 1999, NRI Rez, Czech Replublic, p. 137–143 (1999).Google Scholar
5 Valcke, E., Sneyers, A., and Iseghem, P. Van, Proc. of Safewaste Conf., Oct 1st -5th , 2000, Montpellier, France (2000).Google Scholar
6 Dierckx, A., W. Cool, Lalieux, P., P. De Preter, and Smith, P., ‘The ONDRAF/NIRAS Safety Strategy for the Disposal of category B&C Wastes’, presented at the NEA International Symposium on the Safety Case – 23-25 January 2007.Google Scholar
7 Sneyers, A. and Iseghem, P. Van, Mat. Res. Soc. Symp. Proc. 506, 565–572 (1998).Google Scholar
8 Brodersen, K., Brunel, G., Gens, R., Lambert, F., Nomine, J.C., Sneyers, A., and Iseghem, P. Van, EUR 18228, European Commission, Luxembourg (1998).Google Scholar
9 Marien, A., Smets, S., and Valcke, E., Mater. Res. Soc. Symp. Proc., this volume.Google Scholar
10 Marien, A., Smets, S., Li, X. and Valcke, E., Mater. Res. Soc. Symp. Proc. 1107, 151–159 (2008).Google Scholar
11 Valcke, E., Rorif, R., and Smets, S., accepted for publication in J. Nucl. Mat. Google Scholar
12 Loon, L.R. Van and Kopajtic, Z., PSI, Wurenlingen & Villigen, Switzerland, NAGRA Technical Report 91–11 (1991).Google Scholar
13 Ojovan, M.I., Ojovan, N.V, Golubeva, Z.I., Startceva, I.V., and Barinov, A.S., Mat. Res. Soc. Symp. Proc. Vol. 713, 713–718 (2002).Google Scholar
14 Weetjens, E., Sillen, X. and Valcke, E., Mater. Res. Soc. Symp. Proc. 932, 735–742 (2006).Google Scholar
15 Wang, L., SCK•CEN, Mol, Belgium, SCK•CEN-ER-17 (2006).Google Scholar
16 Mokni, N., Olivella, S., Li, X., Smets, S. and Valcke, E., Physics and Chemistry of the Earth, Parts A/B/C, Volume 33, Supplement 1, S436–S443 (2008).Google Scholar
17 Sercombe, J., Gwinner, B., Tiffreau, C., Simondi-Teisseire, B., and Adenot, F., J. Nucl. Mat. 349, 96–106 (2006).Google Scholar
18 Gwinner, B., Sercombe, J., Tiffreau, C., Simondi-Teisseire, B., Felines, I., and Adenot, F., J. Nucl. Mat. 349, 107–118 (2006).Google Scholar
19 Feunteun, S. Le, Jaffel, H., Diat, O., Guillermo, A., Ledieu, A., and Poulesquen, A., Mater. Res. Soc. Symp. Proc., this volume.Google Scholar
20 Li, X., Bernier, F., and Valcke, E., Mater. Res. Soc. Symp. Proc. 932, 751–758 (2006).Google Scholar
21 Volckaert, G., Ortiz, L., Canniere, P. De et al. , Final report of the MEGAS project, EUR 16235, European Commission, Luxembourg (1995).Google Scholar
22 Honda, A., Kato, T., Tateishi, T. et al. , Corrosion Engineering 55, 635–649 (2006).Google Scholar
23 Lovley, D. and Goodwin, S., Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta 52, 2993–3003 (1988).Google Scholar
24 Fritz, S.J., Clay and Clay minerals, 43 (2), 214–223 (1986).Google Scholar
25 Garavito, A.M., Canniere, P. De, and Kooi, H., J. Phys ans Chem. Earth. Parts A/B/C, Volume 32 (1-7), 421–433 (2007).Google Scholar
26 Kielland, J., J. Am. Chem. Soc. 59-9, 1675–1678 (1937).Google Scholar
27 Aertsens, M., P. De Canniere, Moors, H., and Gompel, M. Van, Mater. Res. Soc. Symp. Proc., this volume. 28. Stevenson, F.J., Humus Chemistry: genesis, composition, reactions, John Wiley and sons, New York (1994).Google Scholar
29 Valcke, E., Sneyers, A., and Iseghem, P. Van, Mat. Res. Soc. Symp. Proc. 663, 141–149 (2001).Google Scholar
30 Brim, H., Venkateswaran, H.M., Kostandarithes, J.K. et al. , Appl. Environm. Microbiology 69, 4575–4582 (2003).Google Scholar
31 Oremland, R.S., J.S.Blum, Bindi, A.B. et al. , Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 65, 4385–4392 (1999).Google Scholar
32 Loon, L. Van and Kopajtic, Z., Radiochimica Acta 54, 193–199 (1991).Google Scholar