Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-v9fdk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-10T16:20:05.082Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Micromechanical testing of oxidised grain boundaries in Ni Alloy 600

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 February 2013

Alisa Stratulat
Affiliation:
Department of Materials, University of Oxford, UK
Steve G. Roberts
Affiliation:
Department of Materials, University of Oxford, UK
Get access

Abstract

Micromechanical testing of focused ion beam (FIB) machined cantilevers was used to study oxidised grain boundaries in Ni-alloy 600. The Ni-alloy 600 samples were exposed in simulated PWR primary water at 325°C for 4500h with a hydrogen partial pressure of 30kPa. The FIB was used to machine small cantilever beams at the selected sites in the Ni alloy 600, cut so that the beam contained a selected grain boundary close to the built-in end. The FIB was also used to make a pre-crack, 700 nm deep, on the grain boundary. Cantilevers were loaded at the free end using a nanoindenter. Cantilevers milled in the un-oxidised sample yielded, and did not fracture. The specimens containing oxidised grain boundaries fractured at the boundary after small amounts of plasticity. Load vs. displacement data were used to calculate the fracture toughness of the oxidised grain boundaries. The fracture toughness associated with fracture of grain boundary oxide for these cantilevers was in the range 0.73-1.82MPa (m)1/2, with an average value of 1.3MPa (m)1/2. We believe this to be the first time the fracture toughness of an oxidised grain boundary has been determined.

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2013 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Dutta, R. S., Journal of Nuclear Materials 393, 343349 (2009).10.1016/j.jnucmat.2009.06.020CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Aguilar, A., Albarran, J. L., Lopez, H. F. and Martinez, L., Materials Letters 61, 274277 (2007)10.1016/j.matlet.2006.04.086CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rebak, R. B. and Szklarska-Smialowska, Z., Corrosion Science 38, 971988 (1996)10.1016/0010-938X(96)00183-7CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Panter, J., Viguier, B., Cloue, J. M., Foucault, M., Combrade, P. and Andrieu, E., Journal of Nuclear Materials 348, 213221 (2006)10.1016/j.jnucmat.2005.10.002CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Di Maio, D and Roberts, SG, Journal of materials research 20, 299302 (2005)10.1557/JMR.2005.0048CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Armstrong, D.E.J., Wilkinson, A.J. and Roberts, S.G., Philosophical Magazine Letters 91, 394400 (2011)10.1080/09500839.2011.573813CrossRefGoogle Scholar