Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-mkpzs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-28T20:44:18.207Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Micromechanisms of Deformation in Nanoporous Gold

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  31 January 2011

Rui Dou  and
Brian Derby
Rui Dou
Affiliation:
rui.dou@posgrad.manchester.ac.uk, University of Manchester, School of Materials, Manchester, United Kingdom
Brian Derby
Affiliation:
brian.derby@manchester.ac.uk
Get access

Abstract

We have carried out a TEM investigation of the micromechanisms of deformation in these nanoporous gold specimens after compression testing. We find that the nanoporous specimens show deformation localised to the nodes between the ligaments of the foamed structure, with very high densities of microtwins and Shockley partial dislocations in these regions. These deformation structures are very different from those seen after solid nanowires are tested in compression, which show very low dislocation densities and a few sparsely distributed twins. However, similar dislocation structures to those found in the nanoporous specimens are observed in the larger nanowires when they are deformed in bending. The currently accepted model for the deformation of nanoporous gold, implicitly assumes that the deformation of these structures is by bending near the nodes where ligaments intersect. We hypothesis that the much higher dislocation densities seen in both the nanoporous gold and the nanowires deformed in bending are evidence for the presence of geometrically necessary dislocations in these deformed structures.

Keywords

nanostructureAustrength
Type
Research Article
Information
MRS Online Proceedings Library (OPL) , Volume 1224: Symposia FF/GG – Mechanical Behavior at Small Scales — Experiments and Modeling , 2009 , 1224-FF09-07
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2010

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Uchic, M. D., Dimiduk, D. M., Florando, J. N., and Nix, W. D., Science 305, 986 (2004).Google Scholar
2 Greer, J. R., Oliver, W. C. and Nix, W. D., Acta Mater 53, 1821 (2005); Errata: J. R. Greer, W. C. Oliver and W. D. Nix, Acta Mater 54, 1705 (2006).Google Scholar
3 Dou, R. and Derby, B., Scripta Mater. 61, 524 (2009).Google Scholar
4 Biener, J., Hodge, A. M. and Hamza, A.V., Appl. Phys. Lett. 87, 121908 (2005).Google Scholar
5 Biener, J., J. et al. Nano Lett. 6, 2379 (2006).Google Scholar
6 Volkert, C. A. and Lilleodden, E. T., Philos. Mag. 86, 5567 (2006).Google Scholar
7 Volkert, C. A., Lilleodden, E. T., Kramer, D. and Weissmuller, J., Appl. Phys. Lett. 89, 061920, (2006).Google Scholar
8 Lee, D., et al. Scripta Mater. 56, 437 (2007).Google Scholar
9 Hakamada, M. and Mabuchi, M., Scripta Mater. 56, 1003 (2007).Google Scholar
10 Hodge, A. M., et al Acta Mater. 55, 1349 (2007).Google Scholar
11 Gibson, L. J. and Ashby, M. F., Proc. Royal Soc. Lon. A, 382, 43 (1982).Google Scholar
12 Gibson, L. J. and Ashby, M. F., Cellular Solids: Structure and Properties. 2nd Edn., (Cambridge University Press, 1997).Google Scholar
13 Greer, J. R. and Nix, W. D., Phys. Rev. B 73, 245410 (2006).Google Scholar
14 Shan, Z. W, et al. Nature Mater.7, 115 (2008).Google Scholar
15 Oh, S. H., Legros, M., Kiener, D. and Dehm, G., Nature Mater. 8, 95 (2009).Google Scholar
16 Dou, R. and Derby, B., J. Mater. Res. In press 25, (2010); DOI 10.1557/JMR.2010.0099.Google Scholar
17 Sun, Y., Ye, J., Minor, A. W. M. and Balk, T. J., Microscopy Res. Tech. 72, 232, (2009).Google Scholar
18 Jin, H. J. et al. Acta Mater. 57, 2665 (2009).Google Scholar
19 Dou, R. and Derby, B., Scripta Mater. 59, 151 (2008).Google Scholar
20 Ji, C. X. and Searson, P.C., J. Phys. Chem. B, 107, 4494 (2003).Google Scholar