Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-8ctnn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T08:32:49.197Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Mocvd Palladium and Platinum Supported on Alumina Catalysts: Preparation and Characterization

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 February 2011

Z. K. Lopez
Affiliation:
Dept. of Chemical Engineering, ESIQIE-IPN, 07738, Mexico, D.F., MEXICO
J. R. Vargas
Affiliation:
Dept. of Metallurgical Engineering, ESIQIE-IPN, AP 75–874, Mexico, D.F., MEXICO
M. A. Valenzuela
Affiliation:
Dept. of Chemical Engineering, ESIQIE-IPN, 07738, Mexico, D.F., MEXICO
D. R. Acosta
Affiliation:
Instituto de Física. UNAM., A.p. 20–364 Mexico, D.F., 01000, MEXICO
Get access

Abstract

An horizontal hot-wall MOCVD reactor was used to prepare palladium and platinum catalysts supported on alumina. A conventional impregnated Pt on alumina catalyst was prepared as comparison. The solids were characterized by XRD, Auger spectroscopy, HREM and H2 -TPR. The operation conditions of the MOCVD reactor were fixed preparing several Pd catalysts until to find the appropriate deposition zone. The particle size of Pt catalysts prepared by MOCVD was at about 7 nm compared with 6 ran obtained with the Pt impregnated catalyst, measured by XRD. The HREM image of the Pt MOCVD catalyst showed a narrower particle size ranging from 1 to 4 nm. After calcination three Pt compounds were detected by TPR, which were attributed to PtO, PtO2 and Pt-Al2O3 interaction in MOCVD preparation. Additionally, a clear reduction of surface oxygens of alumina was also observed.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1998

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1. Armor, J.N., Appl. Catal. 78, 141 (1991).10.1016/0166-9834(91)80103-4Google Scholar
2. Che, M. and Bennett, C.O., Adv. Catal. 36, 55 (1989).Google Scholar
3. López, T., Bosch, P., Morán, M., Gómez, R., J. Phys. Chem., 97, 1671 (1993).Google Scholar
4. Dossi, C., Psaro, R., Bortsch, A., Brivio, E., Galasco, A., Losi, P., Catal. Today, 17, 527 (1993).Google Scholar
5. Köhler, S., Reiche, M., Frobel, C., Baerns, M. in Preparation of Catalysts VI. Scientific Bases for the Preparation of Heterogeneous Catalysts, edited by Poncelet, G. et al. (1995 Elsevier Science B.V.), p. 10091016.Google Scholar
6. Goto, T., Vargas, J.R., Hirai, T., Mat. Sci. Eng., A217/218, 223 (1996).Google Scholar
7. Aguilar-Ríos, G., Valenzuela, M.A., Armendariz, H., Salas, P., Dominguez, J.M., Acosta, D.R., Schifter, I., Appl. Catal. A, 90, 25 (1992).Google Scholar
8. Lieske, H., Lietz, G., Spindler, H., Völter, J., J. Catal. 81, 8 (1983).10.1016/0021-9517(83)90142-2Google Scholar