Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-j824f Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-14T18:11:37.032Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Modeling of the Effects of Radiolysis on UO2-dissolution Employing Recent Experimental Data

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 February 2011

Mats Jonsson ,
Fredrik Nielsen ,
Ella Ekeroth  and
Trygve E. Eriksen
Mats Jonsson
Affiliation:
Department of Chemistry, Nuclear Chemistry, Royal Institute of Technology, SE-100 44 Stockholm, Sweden
Fredrik Nielsen
Affiliation:
Department of Chemistry, Nuclear Chemistry, Royal Institute of Technology, SE-100 44 Stockholm, Sweden
Ella Ekeroth
Affiliation:
Department of Chemistry, Nuclear Chemistry, Royal Institute of Technology, SE-100 44 Stockholm, Sweden
Trygve E. Eriksen
Affiliation:
Department of Chemistry, Nuclear Chemistry, Royal Institute of Technology, SE-100 44 Stockholm, Sweden
Get access

Abstract

This study examines the effect of water radiolysis on the dissolution of uranium dioxide. A model is created to describe the system of uranium dioxide fragments in water, and the production and reactions of radiolysis products (using recent kinetic data). The system is evaluated under different conditions using MAKSIMA-CHEMIST. Conditions examined include presence of carbonate in the water and effects of hydrogen. The simulations are compared to experimental results on spent fuel dissolution. Surprisingly, the simulated U(VI)-release agrees within a factor of three with the experimentally found U(VI)-release. The inhibiting effect of hydrogen is clearly demonstrated by the simulations. From the results of the simulations we are also able to conclude that the main inhibiting effect of H2 is the reaction with OH• and not the reduction of U(VI) to U(IV).

Type
Research Article
Information
MRS Online Proceedings Library (OPL) , Volume 807: Symposium Scientific Basis for Nuclear Waste Management XXVII , 2003 , 385
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2004

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1. Segall, R. L., Smart, R. S. C., and Turner, P. S., in “Surface and Near-Surface Chemistry of Oxide Materials” (Nowotny, J. and Dufour, L.-C., eds.), Vol. 47, p. 527–576. Elsevier Science Publishers B. V., Amsterdam, 1988.Google Scholar
2. Spinks, J. W. T. and Woods, R. J., “An Introduction to Radiation Chemistry.” John Wiley & Sons, Inc, New York, 1964.Google Scholar
3. Eriksen, T. E., Eklund, U.-B., Werme, L., and Bruno, J., J. Nucl. Mater. 227, 76–82 (1995).Google Scholar
4. Bruno, J., Cera, E., Grivé, M., Duro, L., and Eriksen, T. E., Svensk Kärnbränslehantering AB Report TR-03–03, 1–52 (2003).Google Scholar
5. Bruno, J., Cera, E., Grivé, M., Eklund, U.-B., and Eriksen, T. E., Svensk Kärnbränslehantering AB Report TR-99–26, 1–55 (1999).Google Scholar
6. Glatz, J.-P., Carbol, P., Cobos-Sabaté, J., Gouder, T., Miserque, F., Gimenez, J., and Wegen, D., Materials Research Society Symposia Proceedings 663, 449–458 (2001).Google Scholar
7. Shoesmith, D. W., J. Nucl. Mater 282, 1–31 (2000).Google Scholar
8. Ekeroth, E. and Jonsson, M., J. Nucl. Mater, in press (2003).Google Scholar
9. Grenthe, I., Diego, F., Salvatore, F., and Riccio, G., Journal of the Chemical Society, Dalton Transactions, 2439–2443 (1984).Google Scholar
10. Ross, A. B. et al. NDRL/NIST Solution Kinetics Database, 1992.Google Scholar
11. Jonsson, M., Ekeroth, E., Eriksen, T. E., Ljungqvist, K., Puigdomenech, I., and Kovács, S., to be published (2003).Google Scholar
12. Jansson, M., Jonsson, M., and Eriksen, T. E., Svensk Kärnbränslehantering AB Report U-96–44, 1–19 (1994).Google Scholar
13. Eriksen, T. E., Christensen, H., and Bjergbakke, E., Journal of Radioanalytical and Nuclear Chemistry 6, 13–25 (1986).Google Scholar
14. Choppin, G., Liljenzin, J. O., and Rydberg, J., “Radiochemistry and Nuclear Chemistry.” Butterworth-Heinemann, Oxford, 1996.Google Scholar