Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-dk4vv Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-29T10:34:06.854Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Modeling of the Magnetocaloric Effect in Heusler Ni-Mn-X (X = In, Sn, Sb) Alloys Using Antiferromagnetic Five-State Potts Model with Competing Interactions

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  24 March 2011

Vladimir V. Sokolovskiy ,
Vasiliy D. Buchelnikov ,
Konstantin I. Kostromitin ,
Sergey V. Taskaev  and
Peter Entel
Vladimir V. Sokolovskiy
Affiliation:
Chelyabinsk State University, Br. Kashirinykh str. 129, Chelyabinsk, 454001, Russia.
Vasiliy D. Buchelnikov
Affiliation:
Chelyabinsk State University, Br. Kashirinykh str. 129, Chelyabinsk, 454001, Russia.
Konstantin I. Kostromitin
Affiliation:
Chelyabinsk State University, Br. Kashirinykh str. 129, Chelyabinsk, 454001, Russia.
Sergey V. Taskaev
Affiliation:
Chelyabinsk State University, Br. Kashirinykh str. 129, Chelyabinsk, 454001, Russia.
Peter Entel
Affiliation:
University of Duisburg-Essen, Lotharstr. 65, Duisburg, 470848, Germany.
Get access

Abstract

A simple theoretical five-state Potts model for the investigation of magnetocaloric effect in systems with competing ferromagnetic and antiferromagnetic interactions has been proposed. It is shown that this simple model can be applied to the description of the origin of the negative and positive magnetocaloric effect in systems with competing interactions, for example, Heusler alloys.

Keywords

magnetic propertiesalloysimulation
Type
Research Article
Information
MRS Online Proceedings Library (OPL) , Volume 1310: Symposium FF – Magnetocalorics and Magnetic Cooling , 2011 , mrsf10-1310-ff03-07
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2011

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1. Gschneidner, K.A. Jr, Pecharsky, V.K., and Tsokol, A., Rep. Progr. Phys. 68, 1479 (2005).10.1088/0034-4885/68/6/R04Google Scholar
2. Krenke, T., Acet, M., Wassermann, E. Phys. Rev. B 73, 174413 (2006).10.1103/PhysRevB.73.174413Google Scholar
3. Moya, X., Manosa, L., Planes, A. Phys. Rev. B 75, 184412 (2007).10.1103/PhysRevB.75.184412Google Scholar
4. Aksoy, S., Krenke, T., Acet, M. Appl. Phys. Lett. 91, 241916 (2007).10.1063/1.2825283Google Scholar
5. Buchelnikov, V., Sokolovskiy, V., Taskaev, S., and Entel, P., Mater. Science Forum. 635, 137 (2010).10.4028/www.scientific.net/MSF.635.137Google Scholar
6. Buchelnikov, V.D., Entel, P., Taskaev, S.V., Sokolovskiy, V.V. Phys. Rev. B 78, 184427 (2008).10.1103/PhysRevB.78.184427Google Scholar
7. Buchelnikov, V., Sokolovskiy, V., Taskaev, S., and Entel, P., MRS Proceedings. 1200E-G09–06 (2009).Google Scholar
8. Choi, C., and Kim, J., J. Korean Phys. Soc. 46, 562 (2005).Google Scholar
9. Banavar, J.R., and Wu, F.Y., Phys. Rev. B 29, 1511 (1984).10.1103/PhysRevB.29.1511Google Scholar
10. Buchelnikov, V., Taskaev, S., Drobosyuk, M. Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Magnetic Refrigeration at Room Temperature (International Institute of Refrigeration, Paris, 2010) pp. 31.Google Scholar