Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-dzt6s Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-28T05:30:28.425Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

MoO3 incorporation in alkaline earth aluminosilicate glasses

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  08 April 2015

Shengheng Tan
Affiliation:
ISL, Department of Materials Science & Engineering, University of Sheffield, Sir Robert Hadfield Building, Mappin Street, Sheffield, S1 3JD, UK
Michael I Ojovan
Affiliation:
ISL, Department of Materials Science & Engineering, University of Sheffield, Sir Robert Hadfield Building, Mappin Street, Sheffield, S1 3JD, UK
Neil C Hyatt
Affiliation:
ISL, Department of Materials Science & Engineering, University of Sheffield, Sir Robert Hadfield Building, Mappin Street, Sheffield, S1 3JD, UK
Russell J Hand
Affiliation:
ISL, Department of Materials Science & Engineering, University of Sheffield, Sir Robert Hadfield Building, Mappin Street, Sheffield, S1 3JD, UK
Get access

Abstract

Alkaline earth aluminosilicate glasses (AeAS) with different MoO3 additions have been produced and assessed. MoO3 solubility increases with the equimolar substitution of smaller to larger alkaline earths and reaches 5.34 mol% in magnesium aluminosilicate glass (MAS). All visibly homogeneous glasses are X-ray amorphous, while the partially crystallised glasses exhibit some small X-ray diffraction peaks which are probably due to corresponding molybdates. The addition of MoO3 decreases glass transition and crystallisation temperatures and creates two broad Raman bands which are assigned to vibrations of MoO42‒ tetrahedra. The intensities of these bands increase along with MoO3 incorporation until the maximum solubility is reached. Electron microscopy shows that these separated particles are spherical, with sub-micron diameters and are randomly dispersed within glass. The separated phases are formed through liquid-liquid separation and thereafter crystallisation. Overall AeAS glasses look quite promising for molybdate immobilisation with MAS glasses being particularly attractive.

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2015 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Dunnett, B. F., Gribble, N. R., Short, R. J., Turner, E., Steele, C. J., Riley, A. D., Glass Technol.: Eur. J. Glass Sci. Technol., Part A, 54, 166 (2012).Google Scholar
Do Quang, R., Petitjean, V., Hollebecque, F., Pinet, O., Flament, O.A. Prod'homme, WM'03 Conference, Tucson, AZ, 2003.Google Scholar
Lutze, W., Ewing, R. C., Radioactive Wasteforms for the Future. (North Holland, Amsterdam, 1988), p. 788.Google Scholar
Ojovan, M. I., Lee, W. E., An Introduction to Nuclear Waste Immobilisation. (Elsevier, Amsterdam, 2005), p. 250.Google Scholar
Short, R. J., Hand, R. J., Hyatt, N. C., Mobus, G., J. Nucl. Mater., 340, 179 (2005).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Taurines, T., Boizot, B., J. Non-Cryst. Solids, 357, 2723 (2011).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jantzen, C. M., J. Non-Cryst. Solids, 84, 215 (1986).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Techer, I., Advocat, T., Lancelot, J., Liotard, J. M., J. Nucl. Mater., 282, 40 (2000).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shelby, J. E., J. Am. Ceram. Soc., 68, 155 (1985).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tiegel, M., Herrmann, A., Russel, C., Korner, J., Klopfel, D., Hein, J., Kaluza, M. C., J. Mater. Chem. C, 1, 5031 (2013).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tan, S., Ojovan, M.I., Hyatt, N.C., Hand, R.J., J. Nucl. Mater., (2014) (in press).Google Scholar