Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-94fs2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-13T09:46:16.622Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

A moth-eye bio-inspired approach to planar isotropic diffraction

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 February 2011

Petros Ioannis Stavroulakis ,
Stuart Boden  and
Darren Bagnall
Petros Ioannis Stavroulakis
Affiliation:
pjs05r@ecs.soton.ac.uk
Stuart Boden
Affiliation:
sb1@ecs.soton.ac.uk, University of Southampton, Electronics and Computer Science, Southampton, United Kingdom
Darren Bagnall
Affiliation:
dmb@ecs.soton.ac.uk, University of Southampton, Electronics and Computer Science, Southampton, United Kingdom
Get access

Abstract

A regular hexagonally packed biomimetic moth-eye antireflective surface acts as a diffraction grating at short wavelengths of the visible spectrum and shallow angles of incidence. These gratings display strong backscattered iridescence with 6-fold optical symmetry. The optical symmetry of real moth eyes is effectively infinite as nature utilizes large number of uniquely orientated domains. In this work we report on a biomimetic moth-eye surface created via nanosphere lithography with a very large distribution of close-packed tessellated domains and the resulting optical symmetry is compared to that of another widely known highly isotropic diffraction grating, also inspired by nature, the sunflower pattern. A white-light laser reflectometry system is used to measure and compare the diffraction pattern isotropy from both structures. The tessellated close-packed structure diffraction pattern approaches that of infinite optical symmetry even though the underlying pattern only possesses a six-fold symmetry. Hence, the angular isotropy observed for the sunflower pattern is replicated to a large extent via a self-assembly procedure, whilst circumventing the complicated design and manufacturing requirements of the sunflower pattern.

Keywords

self-assemblybiomimetic (assembly)optical properties
Type
Research Article
Information
MRS Online Proceedings Library (OPL) , Volume 1272: Symposia KK/LL/NN/OO/PP – Integrated Miniaturized Materials-From Self-Assembly to Device Integration , 2010 , 1272-OO06-05-LL06-05
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2010

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

[1] Wilson, S.J. and Hutley, M.C., “The Optical Properties of ‘Moth Eye’ Antireflection Surfaces,” Journal of Modern Optics, vol. 29, 1982, pp. 993–1009.Google Scholar
[2] Bernard, C.G., “Structural and functional adaptation in a visual system,” Endeavour, vol. 26, 1967, pp. 79–84.Google Scholar
[3] Stavenga, D.G., Foletti, S., Palasantzas, G., and Arikawa, K., “Light on the moth-eye corneal nipple array of butterflies.,” Proceedings. Biological sciences / The Royal Society, vol. 273, 2006, pp. 661–7.Google Scholar
[4] Weekes, S.M., Ogrin, F.Y., Murray, W.A., and Keatley, P.S., “Macroscopic Arrays of Magnetic Nanostructures from Self-Assembled Nanosphere Templates,” Langmuir, vol. 23, 2007, pp. 1057–1060.10.1021/la061396gGoogle Scholar
[5] Pollard, M.E. and Parker, G.J., “Low-contrast bandgaps of a planar parabolic spiral lattice,” Optics Letters, vol. 34, 2009, p. 2805.Google Scholar
[6] Fan, S., Villeneuve, P., Joannopoulos, J., and Schubert, E., “High Extraction Efficiency of Spontaneous Emission from Slabs of Photonic Crystals,” Physical Review Letters, vol. 78, 1997, pp. 3294–3297.Google Scholar
[7] Vogel, H., “A better way to construct the sunflower head,” Mathem. Biosci., vol. 44, 1979, pp. 179–189.Google Scholar
[8] Mihailescu, M., Preda, A., Cojoc, D., Scarlat, E., and Preda, L., “Diffraction patterns from a phyllotaxis-type arrangement,” Optics and Lasers in Engineering, vol. 46, 2008, pp. 802–809.Google Scholar
[9] Boden, S.A. and Bagnall, D.M., “Tunable reflection minima of nanostructured antireflective surfaces,” Applied Physics Letters, vol. 93, 2008, p. 133108.Google Scholar
[10] Xu, H., Lu, N., Qi, D., Gao, L., Hao, J., Wang, Y., and Chi, L., “Broadband antireflective Si nanopillar arrays produced by nanosphere lithography,” Microelectronic Engineering, vol. 86, 2009, pp. 850–852.10.1016/j.mee.2009.01.059Google Scholar
[11] Chen, Q., Hubbard, G., Shields, P.A., Liu, C., Allsopp, D.W., Wang, W.N., and Abbott, S., “Broadband moth-eye antireflection coatings fabricated by low-cost nanoimprinting,” Applied Physics Letters, vol. 94, 2009, p. 263118.Google Scholar
[12] Stavroulakis, P.I., Christou, N., and Bagnall, D., “Improved deposition of large scale ordered nanosphere monolayers via liquid surface self-assembly,” Materials Science and Engineering: B, vol. 165, 2009, p. 186–189.Google Scholar
[13] Cheung, C.L., Nikoliæ, R.J., Reinhardt, C.E., and Wang, T.F., “Fabrication of nanopillars by nanosphere lithography,” Nanotechnology, vol. 17, 2006, pp. 1339–1343.Google Scholar
[14] Born, M. and Wolf, E., Principles of Optics, Page 449, Cambridge University Press, 2002.Google Scholar
[15] Prum, R.O. and Torres, R.H., “A Fourier tool for the Analysis of Coherent Light Scattering by Bio-Optical Nanostructures,” Integr. Comp. Biol., vol. 43, 2003, pp. 591–602.Google Scholar