Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-dh8gc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-10T17:36:46.169Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Near Conventional Forging of an Advanced TiAl Alloy

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 December 2012

Daniel Huber
Affiliation:
Business Development, Research & Innovation, Böhler Schmiedetechnik GmbH & Co KG, Mariazellerstrasse 25, A-8605 Kapfenberg, Austria
Helmut Clemens
Affiliation:
Department Physical Metallurgy and Materials Testing, Montanuniversität Leoben, A-8700 Leoben, Austria
Martin Stockinger
Affiliation:
Business Development, Research & Innovation, Böhler Schmiedetechnik GmbH & Co KG, Mariazellerstrasse 25, A-8605 Kapfenberg, Austria
Get access

Abstract

Balanced mechanical properties are needed for TiAl low pressure turbine blades envisaged for use in new generation aircraft engines. However, thermomechanical processing of γ-TiAl based alloys is a challenging task due to a small “processing window”. Isothermal forging, as state of the art process for this class of material, results in high productions costs and lower productivity. Due to these facts Bohler Schmiedetechnik GmbH & Co KG has developed a higher efficient “near conventional” thermomechanical processing technology. Lower die temperature and processing at standard atmosphere as well as the use of standard hydraulic presses with higher ram speed result in a highly economical process. Subsequent heat treatment strategies can be used to tailor microstructure and, therefore, mechanical properties according to customer needs. The paper summarizes our effort to establish a near conventional forging route for the fabrication of TiAl components for aerospace industry.

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2012 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Kremmer, S., Chladil, H. F., Clemens, H., Otto, A. and Güther, V., in Ti-2007 Science and Technology, edited by Niinomi, M., Akiyama, S., Hagiwari, M., Ikeda, M. and Maruyama, K. (The Japan Institute of Metals, Sendai, 2007), pp. 989992.Google Scholar
Wallgram, W., Schmölzer, T., Cha, L., Das, G. Güther, V. Clemens, H., Int. J. Mat. Res. 100, 1021 (2009).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Achtermann, M., Güther, V., Klose, J. and Nicolei, H.-P., paper presented at the „4th International Workshop on Titanium Aluminides”, Nuremberg, Germany (September 14-16, 2011).Google Scholar
Clemens, H., Wallgram, W. and Schloffer, M., U.S. Patent No. US 2011/0277891 A1 (17 November 2011).Google Scholar
Schloffer, M., Iqbal, F., Gabrisch, H., Schwaighofer, E., Schimansky, F. P., Mayer, S., Stark, A., Lippmann, T., Göken, M., Pyczak, F. and Clemens, H., Intermetallics 22, 231 (2012).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clemens, H. and Mayer, S., Adv. Eng. Mater., DOI 10.1002/adem.201200231.Google Scholar
Clemens, H., Wallgram, W., Kremmer, S., Güther, V., Otto, A. and Bartels, A., Adv. Eng. Mater. 10, 707, (2008).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Appel, F., Kestler, H. and Clemens, H., Intermetallic compounds – principles and practice, Vol. 3, edited by Westbrook, J. H. and Fleischer, R. L. (WILEY-VCH, Chicester, UK, 2002).Google Scholar