Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-94fs2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-10T09:48:12.267Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

New Self-Focusing Materials: Synthesis, Structures and Nonlinear Optical Properties of Butterfly Shaped Clusters

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 February 2011

S. Shi  and
X. Q. Xin
S. Shi
Affiliation:
Optical Crystal Laboratory, National University of Singapore, Kent Ridge, Singapore 0511
X. Q. Xin
Affiliation:
Optical Crystal Laboratory, National University of Singapore, Kent Ridge, Singapore 0511
Get access

Abstract

Compounds WCu2OS3(PPh3)4 (I) and MoCu2OS3(PPh3)3 (II) were synthesized by reactions of (NH4)2MO2S2 (M = W, Mo), Cu2S and PPh3 in solid state for nonlinear optical studies. A wide transparent window (λ = 400 - 1000 nm) was observed for both clusters, which makes them attractive for nonlinear optical (NLO) applications. NLO properties of the clusters were studied with a 7-ns pulsed laser at 532 nm. Cluster I exhibits mainly optical self-focusing (n2 = 8 × 10-18 m2 W-1, as measured with an 1.2 × 10-4 M acetonitrile solution) with negligibly small nonlinear absorption. Cluster II exhibits both optical self-focusing (n2 = 5 × 10-17 m2 W-1, as measured with a 7.4 × 10-5 M acetonitrile solution) and nonlinear absorption (α2 = 2.6 × 10-10 m W-1). The third-order NLO susceptibilities (χ(3)) of the two clusters at the above-mentioned concentrations are 2 × 10-11 esu for I and 1.2 × 10-10 esu for II respectively. These nonlinear optical properties of the clusters were compared with those of cubic cage shaped and nest shaped clusters to reveal a qualitative structure/NLO property correlation.

Type
Research Article
Information
MRS Online Proceedings Library (OPL) , Volume 374: Symposia ZB – Materials for Optical Limiting , 1994 , 151
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1995

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. (a) Conference on Lasers and Electro-Optics, 1993, Vol. 11, OSA technical digest series; (Optical Society of America, Washington, D.C., 1993). (b) M.J. Soileau, ed. Proc. Soc. Photo-Opt. Instrum. Eng. 1105 (1989). (c) S.R., Marder, J.E., Sohn, and G.D., Stucky, ed. Materials for Nonlinear Optics, Chemical Perspectives (American Chemical Society, Washington, D.C., 1991).Google Scholar
2. Shi, S., Ji, W., and Xin, X.Q., Mater. Res. Soc. Proc. this volume, (1995).Google Scholar
3. Shi, S., Xin, X.Q., and Ji, W., Mater. Res. Soc. Proc. this volume, (1995).Google Scholar
4. McDonald, J.W., Friesen, G.D., Rosenhein, C.D., and Newton, W.E., Inorg. Chim. Acta 72, 205 (1983).Google Scholar
5. Sheik-Bahae, M., Said, A.A., and Van Stryland, E.W., Opt. Lett. 14, 955 (1989).Google Scholar
6. Sheik-Bahae, M., Said, A.A., Wei, T.H., Hagan, D.J., and Van Stryland, E.W., IEEE J. Quant. Electron. 26, 760 (1990).Google Scholar
7. Cao, R., Lei, X.J., Hong, M.C., Huang, Z.Y., and Liu, H.Q., Jiegou Huaxue 11, 34 (1992).Google Scholar
8. Bredas, J.L., Adant, C., Tackx, P., and Persoons, A., Chem. Rev. 94, 243 (1994).Google Scholar
9. Stegeman, G.L., and Torruellas, W., Mat. Res. Soc. Symp. Proc. 328, 397 (1994).Google Scholar
10. Adair, R., Chase, L.L., and Payne, S.A., Phys. Rev. B, 39, 3337 (1989).Google Scholar
11. Sheik-Bahae, M., Hutchings, D.C., Hagan, D.J., and Van Stryland, E.W., IEEE J. Quant. Electron. 27, 1296 (1991).Google Scholar
12. Nakanishi, H., Nonlinear Optics 1, 223 (1991).Google Scholar
13. Kobayashi, T., IEICE Trans. Fundamentals E75–A, 38 (1992).Google Scholar
14. Riddick, J.A., Bunger, W.B., and Sakano, T.K., Organic Solvents: Physical Properties and Method of Purification, 4th ed. (John Wiley & Sons, New York, 1986).Google Scholar
15. For example, (a) McLean, D.G., Sutherland, R.L., Brant, M.C., Brandelik, D.M., Fleitz, P.A., and Pottenger, T., Opt. Lett., 18, 858 (1993). (b) J.S. Meth, H. Vanherzeele, and Y. Wang, Chem. Phys. Lett. 197, 26 (1992). (3) J.S. Shirk, J.R. Lindle, F.J. Bartoli, Z.H. Kafafi, A.W. Snow, and M.E. Boyle, Int. J. Nonlinear Opt. Phys. 1, 699 (1992).Google Scholar
16. Exceptions include (a) Tutt, L.W., and McCahon, S.W., Opt. Lett. 15, 700 (1990). (b) G.R. Allan, D.R. Labergerie, S.J. Rychnovsky, T.F. Boggess, and A.L. Smirl, J. Phys. Chem. 96, 6313 (1992).Google Scholar