Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-fscjk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-28T15:26:01.565Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

NMR Study of Interlayer and Non-interlayer Porewater in Water-saturated Bentonite and Montmorillonite

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  25 January 2013

Torbjörn Carlsson ,
Arto Muurinen  and
Andrew Root
Torbjörn Carlsson
Affiliation:
VTT Technical Research Centre of Finland, Espoo, P.O. Box 1000, FI-02044 VTT, Finland.
Arto Muurinen
Affiliation:
VTT Technical Research Centre of Finland, Espoo, P.O. Box 1000, FI-02044 VTT, Finland.
Andrew Root
Affiliation:
MagSol, Tuhkanummenkuja 2, 00970 Helsinki, Finland.
Get access

Abstract

Bentonite is planned to be used in many countries as an important barrier in high-level waste repositories. Assessment of the barrier with regard to, inter alia, its ability to hinder transport of dissolved radionuclides leaking from a damaged canister containing spent nuclear fuel, requires quantitative data about the pore structure inside bentonite. The present NMR study was made in order to determine the number of distinguishable porewater phases in compacted water-saturated samples of MX-80 bentonite and Na-montmorillonite. The samples were compacted to dry densities in the interval 0.7-1.6 g/cm3 and subsequently saturated with Milli-Q water or 0.1 M NaCl solution in equilibrium cells. The NMR measurements were performed with a high-field 270 MHz NMR spectrometer using a short inter-pulse CPMG method to study proton T1ρ relaxation. The measured relaxation curves were found to consist of one faster and one slower proton relaxation. Subsequent analysis of the data indicated that the faster relaxation was associated with interlayer (IL) water between montmorillonite unit layers, while the slower one was associated with non-interlayer (non-IL) water located outside the interlayer spaces. The results indicate for compacted samples with a dry density of ≥ 1.0 g/cm3, that Na montmorillonite contains a larger relative volume of non-IL water than the corresponding MX-80 bentonite. This in turn, suggests that the stacking number in Na-montmorillonite is smaller than in MX-80 bentonite. Changing the porewater chemistry seemed to have some effect on the non-IL water content in the Na montmorillonite but not in the MX-80 bentonite.

Keywords

microstructurenuclear magnetic resonance (NMR)waste management
Type
Articles
Information
MRS Online Proceedings Library (OPL) , Volume 1518: Symposium LL – Scientific Basis for Nuclear Waste Management XXXVI , 2012 , pp. 167 - 172
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2013 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Posiva. TKS-2009, Eurajoki, Finland (2010).Google Scholar
SKB. SKB TR-10–12, Stockholm, Sweden (2010).Google Scholar
Meunier, A., Clays Clay Miner., 41, 551–566 (2006).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Van Loon, L., Glaus, M., and Muller, W., Appl. Geochem., 22(11), 2536–2552 (2007).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pusch, R., Karnland, O., and Hökmark, H., SKB TR–90–43 (1990).Google Scholar
Ohkubo, T., Kikuchi, H., M., and Yamaguchi, , Phys. Chem. Earth 33, S169–S176 (2008).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Muurinen, A. and Carlsson, T., Posiva Report. (To be published.) Google Scholar
Karnland, O., Olsson, S., and Nilsson, U., SKB TR-06–30 (2006).Google Scholar
Kiviranta, L. and Kumpulainen, S., Posiva Working Report 2011–84 (2011).Google Scholar
Muurinen, A., Posiva Working Report 2009–42 (2009).Google Scholar
Santyr, G.E., Henkelman, R.M., and Bronskill, M.J., J. Magn. Reson., 79, 28–44 (1988).Google Scholar
Kristukat, C., Peak-o-mat. https://sourceforge.net/project/showfiles.php?group_id=67624. (2008).Google Scholar
Montavon, G., Guo, Z., Tournassat, C., Grambow, B., and Le Botlan, D., Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta, 73, 7290–7302. (2009).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carlsson, T., Muurinen, A., Matusewicz, M., and Root, A.. Mater. Res. Soc. Symp. Proc. 1475, Materials Research Society, 397–402 (2012).Google Scholar
Suzuki, S., Sato, H., Ishidera, T., and Fujii, N., J. Contam. Hydrol, 68(1–2), 23–37 (2004).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Holmboe, M., Wold, S., and Jonsson, M., J. Contam. Hydrol., 128, 19–32 (2012).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tournassat, C. and Appelo, C.A.J., Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta 75, 3698–3710 (2011).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Muurinen, A., Posiva Working Report 2010–11 (2010).Google Scholar