Hostname: page-component-6bf8c574d5-qdpjg Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-02-22T08:24:53.070Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

A Numerical Model of Ratcheting in Thermal Barrier Systems

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  17 March 2011

Anette M. Karlsson  and
Anthony G. Evans
Anette M. Karlsson
Affiliation:
Princeton Materials Institute, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ 08540
Anthony G. Evans
Affiliation:
Princeton Materials Institute, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ 08540
Get access

Abstract

Morphological instabilities in thermally grown oxide, observed in a range of thermal barrier systems, have been simulated by developing and using a numerical code. The simulations are based on a range of phenomena and constituent properties, such as plasticity in the bond coat and growth strains in the TGO at high temperature. One of the key implications is that the incidence of reverse yielding upon reheating is a necessary condition for morphological instabilities. That is, whenever the condition for reverse yielding is satisfied during the initial cycles, the imperfection amplitude increases with thermal cycling (ratcheting). Otherwise, shakedown occurs, i.e., the imperfection amplitude stops growing.

Type
Research Article
Information
MRS Online Proceedings Library (OPL) , Volume 645: Symposium M – Thermal Barrier Coatings-2000 , 2000 , M9.4.1
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2001

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1. Miller, R.A., Journal of the American Ceramic Society, 67, 517 (1984)Google Scholar
2. Strangman, T.E., Thin Solid Films, 127, 93–105 (1985).Google Scholar
3. Wright, P.K., Evans, A.G., Current opinion in solid state & materials science, 4, 255–265 (1999)Google Scholar
4. Stiger, M.J., Yanar, N.M., Topping, M.G., Pettit, F.S., and Meier, G.H., Zeitschrift für Metallkunde, 90, [12], 1069–1078 (1999).Google Scholar
5. DeMasi-Marcin, J.T. and Gupta, D.K., Surface and Coatings Technology, 68/69, 1 (1994)Google Scholar
6. Evans, A.G., Mumm, D.R., Hutchinson, J.W., Meier, G.H., and Pettit, F.S., Progress in materials science, (2000) in pressGoogle Scholar
7. Tolpygo, V.K., Dryden, J.R., and Clarke, D.R., Acta Materialia, 46, 927–937 (1998)Google Scholar
8. Tolpygo, V.K. and Clarke, D.R., Acta Materialia, 48, 3283–3293 (2000)Google Scholar
9. He, M.Y., Evans, A.G., and Hutchinson, J.W., Acta Materialia, 48, 2593–2601 (2000).Google Scholar
10. Ambrico, J.M., Begley, M.R., and Jordan, E.H., (2000) submitted for publication.Google Scholar
11. Gell, M, Vaidyanathanm, K., Barber, B., Cheng, J, and Jordan, E., Metallurgical and Materials Transaction A, 30A, 427–435 (1999).Google Scholar
12. Karlsson, A.M., Evans, A.G., (2000) submitted for publicationGoogle Scholar
13. Mumm, D.R., Spitsberg, I., and Evans, A.G., Acta Mater. (2000) submitted for publication.Google Scholar