Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-q99xh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-28T06:37:24.906Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

On the effect of grain boundaries on the electronic and transport properties of graphene

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  22 May 2014

Watheq Elias
Affiliation:
School of Physics and Astronomy Cardiff University, The Parade, Cardiff, CF24 3AA, UK. Department of Physics, College of Science, Koya University, Erbil, Iraq.
M. Elliott
Affiliation:
School of Physics and Astronomy Cardiff University, The Parade, Cardiff, CF24 3AA, UK.
C. C. Matthai*
Affiliation:
School of Physics and Astronomy Cardiff University, The Parade, Cardiff, CF24 3AA, UK.
Get access

Abstract

In studying large scale graphene structures it is necessary to consider the grain boundaries between the many single-crystal domains. The disruption of the crystallographic structure has consequences for both the electronic and transport properties. Although there has been much interest in this area in recent years, the size of system makes it difficult for ab initio methods to be applied to large structures and tight-binding models have provided some interesting results [1]. The semi-empirical Extended Hückel Theory (EHT) has advantage of being able to take account of charge reordering and to study very large systems. We have already applied this approach to study electrical transport across organic molecules and carbon nanoribbons. In this paper, we report on the results of EHT self-consistent calculations carried out to investigate the effect of grain boundaries on both the electronic structure and the electrical transport.

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2014 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Song, J., Liu, H., Jiang, H., Sun, Q., and Xie, X. C., Phys. Rev. B 86, 085437 (2012).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Novoselov, K. S. et al. ., Science 306 (5696), 666669 (2004).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Castro Neto, H., et al. ., Rev. Mod. Phys. 81, 109162 (2009).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Katsnelson, Mikhail I., Materials Today 10(12), 2027 (2007).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bae, Sukang, et al. ., Nature Nanotechnology 5(8), 574578 (2010).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Banhart, Florian, et al. ., ACS Nano 5(1), 2641 (2011).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yazyev, Oleg V. and Louie, Steven G., Nat. Mater. 9(10), 806809 (2010).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yazyev, Oleg V. and Louie, Steven G., Phys. Rev. B 81(19), 195420 (2010).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carlsson, J. M., Ghiringhelli, L. M., and Fasolino, A., Phys. Rev. B 84, 165423 (2011).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Akhukov, M. A. et al. ., Phys. Rev. B 85, 115407 (2012).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Los, J. H., Ghiringhelli, L. M., Meijer, E. J., and Fasolino, A.. Phys. Rev. B 72, 214102 (2005).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Silva Araújo, Joice da and Nunes, R. W., Phys. Rev. B 81, 073408 (2010).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Koskinen, Pekka, Malola, Sami, and Häkkinen, H., Phys. Rev. Lett. 101(11), 115502 (2008).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kim, K, ACS Nano 5(3), 21422146 (2011).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zhang, Junfeng and Zhao, Jijun, Carbon 55, 151159 (2013).CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lahiri, J., Lin, Y., Bozkurt, P., Oleynik, I. I., and Batzill, M., Nat. Nano. 5(5), 326329 (2010).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mesaros, A. et al. ., Phys. Rev. B 82(20), 205119 (2010).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zhang, Junfeng, Gao, Junfeng, Liu, Lizhao, and Zhao, J., J. Appl. Phys. 112, 053713 (2012).CrossRefGoogle Scholar