Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-m6dg7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-10T08:43:56.092Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Photopolymerization Dynamics Studies of Acrolein on Al, Ni, and Au Substrates Using Surface Second Harmonic Generation

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 February 2011

Fang Chen
Affiliation:
School of Chemical Engineering, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN 47907-1283
Suchitra Subrahmanyan
Affiliation:
School of Chemical Engineering, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN 47907-1283
Hilary S. Lackritz
Affiliation:
School of Chemical Engineering, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN 47907-1283
Get access

Abstract

The dynamics of the gas phase photopolymerization of acrolein on aluminum (Al), nickel (Ni), and gold (Au) substrates were studied in-situ and in real time using surface second harmonic generation (SSHG) and monitoring vapor pressure decay. The Al and Ni substrates had a significant effect on the apparent rate of polymerization. A dark reaction after irradiation occurred in the absence of metal (Al or Ni) substrates, but no dark reaction was observed when the metal substrates were present. The significant differences in the metal/monomer interactions during photopolymerization are indicated by SEMs of the polyacrolein, as well as evidence from FTIR-ATR spectra. The SSHG intensities from the Au, Al, and polyacrolein surfaces were obtained.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1995

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1. Barraud, A., Rosilio, C., Texier, A. R., Thin Solid Films 68, 91 (1980)Google Scholar
2. Ringsdorf, H., Agrew Chem.Int. Ed. 15,764 (1976)Google Scholar
3. Maun, B. and Kuhn, H., J. Appl. Phys. 42, 4398 (1971)Google Scholar
4. Blacet, F. E., Fielding, G. H., J.G. Roof. J. Am. Soc. 59, 2375 (1935)Google Scholar
5. Melville, H. W., Proc. Royal. Soc. A. 163, 511 (1957)Google Scholar
6. Lewis, F. D., Nepras, M. J., Hampsch, H. L., Tetrahedron 43 (7), 1635 (1987)Google Scholar
7. White, A.N., in Polymer surfaces, edited by Clark, D. T. and Feast, W. J. (John Wiley & Sons, New York, 1978), p.155 Google Scholar
8. Odian, G., Principle of Polymerization Chemistry. ed. (John Wiley and Sons, New York, 1981) p. 179 Google Scholar
9. Tsao, J. Y. and Enrlich, D. J., Appl. Phys. Lett. 42 (12), 997 (1983)Google Scholar
10. Corn, R. M. and Higgins, D. A., Chem.. Rev. 94, 107 (1994)Google Scholar
11. Aussenegg, F.R., Leitner, A., Gold, H., Appl. Phys. A 60,97 (1995)Google Scholar
12. Shen, Y.R., Annu. Rev. Phys. Chem. 40, 327 (1989)Google Scholar
13. Heinz, T.F., Nonlinear Surface Elactromagnetic Phenomena, edited by Ponatch, H. F. and Stegence, G. I. (Elserier Science Publishers, 1991)Google Scholar
14. Berkovics, G., Rasing, Th., Shen, Y.R., J. Chem. Phys. 85 (12), 7374 (1986)Google Scholar
15. Zhuo, X.L., Zhu, X.Y., White, J.M., Surface Science Report 13, 73 (1991)Google Scholar
16. Fishier, R.F., in Acrolein, edited by Smith, C. W. (John Wiley & Sons, New York, 1962) p.211 Google Scholar
17. Usanmaz, A. and Dogan, R.D., Polymer J. 22 (3), 233 (1990)Google Scholar