Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-s22k5 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-01-15T06:31:15.087Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Pore Size Distributions in Hardened Cement Paste by Sem Image Analysis

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 February 2011

Sidney Diamond  and
Mark E. Leeman
Sidney Diamond
Affiliation:
School of Civil Engineering, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN 47907
Mark E. Leeman
Affiliation:
School of Civil Engineering, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN 47907
Get access

Abstract

Technical requirements for determining the size distribution of capillary pores in hardened cement paste by SEM image analysis are discussed. Results of such measurements are reported for a set of hardened cement pastes of w:c ratio 0.40 and 0.25, and of ages ranging from 1 to 28 days. Pore size distributions based on conventional mercury intrusion porisimetry are presented for the same pastes. Estimates of pore diameters by mercury intrusion are two orders of magnitude smaller than the sizes revealed by the image analysis. Diameters of air voids are even more drastically underestimated by mercury intrusion. Typical micrographs are provided to illustrate the physical reality of the image analysis results, and the technical reasons underlying the conventional misinterpretation of MIP results for hydrated cements are reviewed.

Type
Research Article
Information
MRS Online Proceedings Library (OPL) , Volume 370: Symposia Va/Vb – Microstructure of Cement-Based Systems/Bonding and Interfaces in Cement... , 1994 , 217
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1995

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Lange, D. A., Jennings, H. M., and Shah, S. P., Cem. Concr. Res. 24, 841 (1994).Google Scholar
2. Powers, T. C., Research Department Bull. 90, Portland Cement Assn., Skokie, IL, 28 pp. (1958).Google Scholar
3. Johnson, S., in Ouantitative Microscopy, DeHoff, R. T. and Rhines, F. N., 422 pp., McGraw Hill, New York (1968).Google Scholar
4. Winslow, D. N. and Diamond, S., J. Materials 5, 564 (1970).Google Scholar
5. Leeman, M. E., M.S.C.E Thesis, Purdue University, 81 pp. (1994)Google Scholar