Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gvvz8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-29T10:22:36.510Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Probing Radiation Damage in Plutonium Alloys with Multiple Measurement Techniques

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 February 2011

Scott K. McCall
Affiliation:
mccall10@llnl.govScott_McCall@comcast.net, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, Livermore, California, United States
Mike Fluss
Affiliation:
fluss1@llnl.gov, United States
Brandon W. Chung
Affiliation:
chung7@llnl.gov, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, 7000 East Ave., L-359, Livermore, California, 94551, United States, 925-423-3896
Get access

Abstract

A material subjected to radiation damage will usually experience changes in its physical properties. Measuring these changes in the physical properties provides a basis to study radiation damage in a material which is important for a variety of real world applications from reactor materials to semiconducting devices. When investigating radiation damage, the relative sensitivity of any given property can vary considerably based on the concentration and type of damage present as well as external parameters such as the temperature and starting material composition. By measuring multiple physical properties, these differing sensitivities can be leveraged to provide greater insight into the different aspects of radiation damage accumulation, thereby providing a broader understanding of the mechanisms involved. In this report, self-damage from α-particle decay in Pu is investigated by measuring two different properties: magnetic susceptibility and resistivity. The results suggest that while the first annealing stage obeys second order chemical kinetics, the primary mechanism is not the recombination of vacancy-interstitial close pairs.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2010

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

[1] McCall, S. K. et al., Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 103, 17179 (2006).Google Scholar
[2] Robinson, M. T. J. Nucl. Mater. 216, 1 (1994).Google Scholar
[3] Kubota, A. et al., Journal of Computer-Aided Materials Design 14, 367 (2007).Google Scholar
[4] Wolfer, W. G. Los Alamos Science 26, 274 (2000).Google Scholar
[5] Robinson, M. et al., Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research Section B: Beam Interactions with Materials and Atoms 267, 2967 (2009).Google Scholar
[6] Dremov, V. V. et al., J. Nucl. Mater. 385, 79 (2009).Google Scholar
[7] Dremov, V. V. et al., J. Alloys Compd. 444–445, 197 (2007).Google Scholar
[8] Jomard, G. et al., J. Alloys Compd. 444–445, 310 (2007).Google Scholar
[9] Wigley, D. A. Proc. R. Soc. London A 284, 344 (1964).Google Scholar
[10] Fluss, M. J. et al., J. Alloys Compd. 368, 62 (2004).Google Scholar
[11] McCall, S. K. et al., in Actinides 2006--Basic Science, Applications and Technology, edited by K. Blobaum, J. M. et al., (Mater. Res. Soc. Symp. Proc. 986, Boston MA, 2007) p. 107.Google Scholar
[12] Pauw, L. J. van der, Philips Technical Review 20, 220 (1958).Google Scholar
[13] McCall, S. K. et al., J. Alloys Compd. 444–445, 168 (2007).Google Scholar
[14] McCall, S. K. et al., Physica B: Condensed Matter 403, 1225 (2008).Google Scholar
[15] Marianetti, C. A. et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 101, 056403 (2008).Google Scholar
[16] Hall, R. O. A. and Mortimer, M. J. J. Low Temp. Phys. 4, 421 (1971).Google Scholar