Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-8bhkd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-13T09:46:32.205Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Progress in Out-Of-Pile Study of Low Enriched UMo/AlSi Fuel

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 February 2011

Marilyne Cornen ,
Xavière Iltis ,
Fabrice Mazaudier ,
Sylvie Dubois  and
Patrick Lemoine
Marilyne Cornen
Affiliation:
marilyne.cornen@cea.fr, CEA Cadarache, DEN/DEC/SPUA/LCU, Bat.315, Saint Paul Lez Durance, 13108, France, +33 4 42 25 70 00 (53.08)
Xavière Iltis
Affiliation:
xaviere.iltis@cea.fr, CEA Cadarache, DEN/DEC, Saint Paul Lez Durance, 13108, France
Fabrice Mazaudier
Affiliation:
fabrice.mazaudier@cea.fr, CEA Cadarache, DEN/DEC, Saint Paul Lez Durance, 13108, France
Sylvie Dubois
Affiliation:
sylvie.dubois@cea.fr, CEA Cadarache, DEN/DEC, Saint Paul Lez Durance, 13108, France
Patrick Lemoine
Affiliation:
patrick.lemoine@cea.fr, CEA Saclay, DEN/DSOE, Gif sur Yvette, 91191, France
Get access

Abstract

The main problem we have to face in order to improve the in-pile behaviour of the UMo/Al dispersed fuel, is the instability of the interaction zone, that is formed between the UMo particles and their surrounding Al matrix during irradiation. As the latest irradiations (e.g. IRIS 3 or RERTR 6) tend to prove, addition of Si into the Al matrix seems to be beneficial for the interaction rate decrease. To further understand the role of silicon, a wide out-of-pile interdiffusion study has been launched in CEA-France in 2006 and is still under progress. It has given promising preliminary results by showing a real effect of Si addition upon the interaction zone. The first results related to the physico-chemical aspects of the modified UMo/Al interaction as well as the kinetics aspects of the interaction layer (IL) formation are described in this paper. On a wide range of annealed couples made of UMo7 or UMo10 and Al-Si matrix (Si content ranging from 0.11 wt % to 12 wt %), the IL thicknesses have been systematically measured. Microstructures have been fully characterized by means of optical and scanning electron microscopy and the elementary compositions have been evaluated through EDX analyses. Finally, XRD characterizations and micro-hardness tests have also been performed on a few samples. On the basis of these different results, we discuss first clues about the role played by silicon on slowing down the UMo/Al interaction process.

Keywords

annealingdiffusionmicrostructure
Type
Research Article
Information
MRS Online Proceedings Library (OPL) , Volume 1043: Symposium T – Materials Innovations for Next-Generation Nuclear Energy , 2007 , 1043-T09-10
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2008

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Huet, F. et al. , RRFM 2005, 10-13 April 2005, Budapest, Hungary.Google Scholar
2. Kim, Y.S. et coll., JNM 245 (1997) 179–184 Google Scholar
3. Palancher, H. et al. , J. Appl. Cryst. (2007), 40.Google Scholar
4. Mazaudier, F. et al. , RRFM 2006, Sofia, Bulgaria, April 30-May 3, 2006.Google Scholar
5. Kim, Y.S. et al. , RERTR 2005, Boston, USA, Nov. 6-10, 2005.Google Scholar
6. Garc, J.E.ès et coll., Comput. Mater. Sci (2006), Vol. 40, Issue 1, July 2007, Pages 6–19 Google Scholar
7. Boucher, R., JNM, 1 (1959) 13.Google Scholar
8. DeLuca, L.S., Sumsion, H.T., KAPL 1747, May 1957.Google Scholar
9. Kramer, D., JNM 4, n°3 (1961) 281–286.Google Scholar
10. Mirandou, M. et al. , JNM 323 (2003) 29–35.Google Scholar
11. Cornen, M. et al. , RRFM 2007, RRFM 2007, 11 – 15 Mars 2007, Lyon, France.Google Scholar
12. Garcès, J.E. et al. , RERTR 2005, Boston, USA, Nov. 6-10, 2005.Google Scholar
13. Savchenko, A., RRFM 2006, Sofia, Bulgaria, April 30-May 3, 2006.Google Scholar
14. Mirandou, M. et al. , RERTR 2007, Prague, Czech Republic, Sept. 23-27, 2007.Google Scholar
15. Hofman, G.L. et al. , RERTR 2006, Oct. 29 – Nov. 2, 2006, Cape Town, Republic of South Africa.Google Scholar
16. Kim, Y.S. et al. , RERTR 2006, Oct. 29 – Nov. 2, 2006, Cape Town, Republic of South Africa.Google Scholar
17. Ripert, M. et al. , RRFM 2006, Sofia, Bulgaria, April 30-May 3, 2006.Google Scholar
18. Repas, P.E. et al. , Transactions of the ASM, Volume 57, 1964.Google Scholar