Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-q99xh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-28T21:17:05.407Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Provenance and Manufacture of Mixtec Style Objects Found on the Surrounding Structures of the Precinct of the Great Temple of Tenochtitlan

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  22 May 2014

Reyna B. Solís Ciriaco Ciriaco  and
José L. Ruvalcaba Sil
Reyna B. Solís Ciriaco Ciriaco*
Affiliation:
Museo del Templo Mayor, Instituto Nacional de Antropologia e Historia, Seminario 8, Centro histórico, México D.F., C.P. 06060, Mexico.
José L. Ruvalcaba Sil
Affiliation:
Instituto de Física, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México. Circuito de la Investigación Científica s/n, Ciudad Universitaria, México DF 04510, Mexico.
*
* e-mail: reynabsolis@hotmail.com
Get access

Abstract

Seventy six speckled greenstone items have been recovered on the surrounding structures of the Aztec precinct of the Great Temple of Tenochtitlan. Several researchers have identified the material as marble. Also, these objects have been labeled as Mixtec style due to the raw materials involved in their manufacture as well as their apparent similarity with other known Mixtec objects. The main objective of this essay is to determine the raw materials and the technology employed on its manufacture. Based on earlier composition analysis using Infrared spectroscopy (FTIR) and X-ray Fluorescence (XRF), it became clear that all items are made of the same calcite-serpentine mineral alloy, which probably comes from the Oaxaca region. It is interesting the homogeneity and standardization among these pieces by analyzing them with experimental archaeology and the characterization of their manufacturing traces. Comparing their raw material, morphology and techniques with those of Mixtec sites, the analysis revealed that they are not in fact related at all; however they do coincide with the manufacturing process of Tenochca (Aztec) style objects. This fact might point towards the actual origin of the raw materials, their obtainment and the technology behind the elaboration of luxury goods at Tenochtitlan.

Keywords

archaeologyscanning electron microscopy (SEM)tribology
Type
Articles
Information
MRS Online Proceedings Library (OPL) , Volume 1618: Symposium 8A – Cultural Heritage and Archaeological Issues in Materials Science , 2014 , pp. 121 - 127
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2014 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Urueta, C., “Presencia del material mixteco dentro del Templo Mayor”, Bachelor Thesis, Escuela Nacional de Antropologia e Historia, Instituto Nacional de Antropologia e Historia, 1990, pp. 4–7 & 92-94.Google Scholar
Melgar, E., Monterrosa, H., Tecnología y estilo de los penates mixtecos vistos desde el Templo Mayor de Tenochtitlan, V Mesa Redonda de Monte Alban, Oaxaca, Mexico, 2011.Google Scholar
Velázquez, A., La producción especializada de los objetos de concha del Templo mayor de Tenochtitlan, (Instituto Nacional de Antropologia e Historia, 2007).Google Scholar
Carr, C., in Style, Society, and Person. Archaeological and Ethnological Perspectives, edited by Carr, C. and Neitzel, J. E. (Plenum Press, 1995) pp. 151–170.Google Scholar
Melgar Tísoc, E., Solís, R., Serpentine objects form the Great Temple of Tenochtitlan: Technological styles identification by Scanning Electron Microscopy (SEM), Annual meeting of the Society for American Archaeology, Austin, 2007.Google Scholar
Gosselain, O.P., Man 27(3) 583 (1992).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wobst, H.M., “Stylistic behavior and information exchange” in For the Director. Research Essay in Honor of James B. Griffen, Anthropology papers 61, edited by Cleland, C. E. (Museum of Anthropology of University of Michigan, 1977) pp. 321.Google Scholar
Spores, R., Robles, N., Latin American Antiquity 18(3), 344 (2007).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Melgar, E., “Una relectura del comercio de la turquesa: entre yacimientos, talleres y consumidores”, in Caminos y mercados de México, edited by Long, J. and Attolini, A., (Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México - Instituto Nacional de Antropologia e Historia, 2010) pp. 153–168.Google Scholar
Melgar, E., Report. La lapidaria del Templo Mayor: estilos y tradiciones tecnológicas. Museo del Templo Mayor, Instituto Nacional de Antropologia e Historia, Mexico, 2011.Google Scholar
Melgar, E., Solís, R., Arqueología 42, 118–134 (2009).Google Scholar
Melgar, E., Solís, R., Report. Análisis tecnológico de objetos lapidarios de distintos sitios de la Mixteca y los Valles Centrales de Oaxaca. Museo del Templo Mayor, Instituto Nacional de Antropologia e Historia, Mexico, 2012.Google Scholar
Melgar, E., Solís, R., González, E., in Producción de bienes de prestigio ornamentales y votivos de la América antigua, edited by Melgar, E., Solís, R. and González, E., 2010, pp. 7–22.Google Scholar
Melgar, E., Solís, R., “Manufacturing Techniques of the Turquoise Mosaics from the Great Temple of Tenochtitlan, Mexico” in LASMAC. 2nd Latin American Symposium on Physical and Chemical Methods in Archaeology, Art and Cultural Heritage Conservation. Symposium on Archaeological and Art Issues in Materials Science, edited by Ruvalcaba, J., Reyes, J., Arenas, J. and Velázquez, A. (Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Universidad Autonoma de Campeche, Instituto Nacional de Antropologia e Historia, 2010) pp. 119–124.Google Scholar
Melgar, E., Ruvalcaba, J., Calligaro, T., “Manufacturing Analysis and Non Destructive Characterisation of Green Stone Objects from the Tenochtitlan Templo Mayor Museum, Mexico” in Proceedings of the 37th International Symposium on Archaeometry, 12th-16th May 2008, Siena, Italy, edited by Turbanti-Memmi, Isabella, (Springer, 2011) pp. 299–304.Google Scholar
Melgar, E., Velázquez, A., Marín, M., Solís, R., Ruvalcaba, J., “The Turquoise Disk from the Offering 99 at the Templo Mayor in Tenochtitlan” in Turquoise in Mexico and North America, edited by King, J.C.H., Carocci, M., Cartwright, C., McEwan, C. and Stacey, R., (Archetype, 2012) pp. 75–90.Google Scholar
Ruvalcaba, J., Melgar, E., Curado, J., Laclavetine, K., Calligaro, T., 2013, “Caracterización y Procedencia de Piedras Verdes de las Ofrendas del Templo Mayor, Tenochtitlán” in Técnicas analíticas aplicadas a la caracterización y producción de materiales arqueológicos en el área Maya, edited by Velázquez, Adrián y Lowe, Lynneth, (Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, 2013) pp. 163–168.Google Scholar
Ruvalcaba, J.L., Ramírez, D., Aguilar, V., Picazo, F., X-ray Spectrometry 39, 338–345 (2010).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ruvalcaba Sil, J.L., Filloy, L., Vaggi, M., Tapia Gálvez, L.H., Sánchez Becerra, R., “Estudio no destructivo in situ de la Máscara de Malinaltepec” in La Máscara de Malinaltepec, Martínez del Campo, S. coord. (CONACULTA- Instituto Nacional de Antropologia e Historia, 2010) pp. 153–168.Google Scholar
Filloy Nadal, L.; Magaloni Kerpel, D., Ruvalcaba Sil, J.L., Sánchez Hernández, R., “Las materias primas utilizadas para la manufactura de las figurillas y las hachas de la Ofrenda 4 de La Venta: caracterización y fuentes de origen” in La Ofrenda 4 de la Venta, Un tesoro Olmeca reunido en el Museo Nacional de Antropología. Estudios y catálogo razondo. Edited by Magaloni Kerpel, D. and Filloy, L. (Instituto Nacional de Antropologia e Historia, 2013) pp. 103–127.Google Scholar
Velázquez, A. and Melgar, E., Producciones palaciegas tenochcas en objetos de concha y lapidaria, Annual meeting of the Society for American Archaeology, Sacramento, 2011.Google Scholar