Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-5r2nc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-01-29T23:42:28.254Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Recycled Rubber in Cement Composites

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 February 2011

D. Raghavan ,
K. Tratt  and
R. P. Wool
D. Raghavan
Affiliation:
Department of Chemistry, Howard University, 525 College Street, N.W., Washington D.C. 20059
K. Tratt
Affiliation:
Department of Material Science and Engineering, 1304 W. Green Street, University of Illinois, Urbana, IL 61801.
R. P. Wool
Affiliation:
Department of Material Science and Engineering, 1304 W. Green Street, University of Illinois, Urbana, IL 61801.
Get access

Abstract

Disposal of 200 million waste tires in the US each year has become a major problem. An environmentally sound innovative technology of recycling rubber in cement matrix was examined. Using silane coupling agent the rubber was bonded to the hydrating cement making a lighter composite, which absorbed more energy than ordinary Portland cement. The bonding information was obtained by peel strength analysis. SEM was used to understand the mode of fracture in pure cement paste, cement bonded rubber composite and rubber filled cement paste. It was found that cracks propagate through the rubber particle in rubber bonded cement composite while in unbonded rubber cement mix, the cracks propagate around the interface. The density and shrinkage measurements are also discussed.

Type
Research Article
Information
MRS Online Proceedings Library (OPL) , Volume 344: Symposium I – Materials and Processes for Environmental Protection , 1994 , 177
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1994

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

(1) Paul, J., Encycl. Polym. Sci. and Eng., 14, 787 (1985).Google Scholar
(2) Raghavan, D. and Torma, A. E., in Bioprocess Engineering Symposium edited by Hochmuth, R., (Amer. Soc. Mech. Eng., 16, New York, NY, 1990) pp. 81–87.Google Scholar
(3) Takallou, H. B. and Takallou, M. B., Elastomerics, 25, 19 (1991).Google Scholar
(4) Hansen, E. R., Rock Products, 13, 29(1992).Google Scholar
(5) Anonymous, Biocycle, 34, 9(1993).Google Scholar
(6) Ahagon, A. and Gent, A. N., J. Polym. Sci., 13, 1285 (1975).Google Scholar
(7) Lee, B. I., Burnett, L., Miller, T., Postage, B. and Cuneo, J., Cement Concr. Res., 23, 967(1993).Google Scholar
(8) Taylor, H. W., Cement Chemistry, 2nd Edition, (Academic Press, New York, 1990), p.15 2.Google Scholar
(9) Plueddemann, E., in Polymer Ceramics, and Metal Matrix Composites edited by Ishida, H., (Elsevier Science Publishers, NY, 1988), pp. 17–33.Google Scholar
(10) Russell, P. R., M. S Thesis, University of Illinois, 1991.Google Scholar
(11) ASTM D 903-49, ASTM Standards, Philadelphia, PA. pp. 22–24.Google Scholar
(12) ASTM C109-92, ASTM Standards, Philadelphia, PA, pp. 62–66.Google Scholar
(13) Allen, P. W. in Natural Rubber and Synthetics, (John Wiley and Sons, New York, 1972), pp. 1–24.Google Scholar
(14) Wool, R. P., in Structure and Strength of Polymer Interfaces. (Hanser Press, NY, 1994), in press.Google Scholar
(15) Shutov, F. and Volfson, S., in (Amer. Chem. Soc. Proc., New Orleans, LA, 1992) pp. 1–10.Google Scholar