Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-s22k5 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-01-29T23:49:45.995Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Removal of Microcontaminants From Surfaces Using a Chemicalfree, Laser-Assisted Process

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 February 2011

Audrey C. Engelsberg
Audrey C. Engelsberg*
Affiliation:
Radiance Services Company, 4405 East West Hwy, Ste. 512, Bethesda, MD 20814
Get access

Abstract

The ability to control and eliminate microcontamination from the manufacturing process is becoming a critical technology issues for such diverse industries as semiconductors, aerospace, and automotive. Current industrial cleaning practices use large amounts of water and chemicals which require disposal. Dry environmentally benign technologies can be alternatives. In this paper, we will look at an alternative technology which consists of deep ultraviolet photons coupled with a flowing inert gas, and compare it to current wet cleaning practices in the semiconductor industry.

Type
Research Article
Information
MRS Online Proceedings Library (OPL) , Volume 344: Symposium I – Materials and Processes for Environmental Protection , 1994 , 235
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1994

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Hattori, T., Semicond. Intern., November, 1992, p. 15.Google Scholar
2. Francis, T., Semicond. Intern., October, 1993, p. 62.Google Scholar
3. Iscoff, R., Semicond. Intern., July, 1993, p. 58.Google Scholar
4. Ohmi, T., Proc. IEEE, 81 (5) 716 (1993).Google Scholar
5. Schmidt, H. F., Meuris, M. M., Mertens, P. W., Verhaverbeke, S., Heyns, M. M., and Dillenbeck, K., Microcontam., September/October, 1993, p. 27.Google Scholar
6. Poliak, R., Matthews, R., Gupta, P., Frost, M., and Tripplett, B., in Proc. Microcontamination 91 (San Jose, CA, 1991), p.511.Google Scholar
7. “Ultraclean methods are keys to success.”, Microcontamination, January, 1993, p. 14.Google Scholar
8. Bhat, S., Van Eck, B., and Menon, V., in Proceedings, Microncontamination 92, (Santa Clara, CA, 1992), p. 588.Google Scholar
9. “Ultrapure markets up”, Semicond. Intern., April, 1993, p. 24.Google Scholar
10. “Ultrapure markets up”, Semicond. Intern., April, 1993 ref. 8.Google Scholar
11. Carr, G., Semicond. Intern., June, 1993, p. 104.Google Scholar
12. Sorensen, C.T., SEMI/SEMATECH News, November, 1993, p. 4.Google Scholar
13. Ladendorf, K., in Austin American-Statesman, (Austin, TX, October 4, 1993) p. C–1.Google Scholar
14. Engelsberg, A. C. and Dehais, J. A., in Proceedings, SEMI Environmental Conference Ill, (San Jose, CA, 1993).Google Scholar
15. Ranade, M. B., Aerosol Sci and Technol. 7 (1987) 161.Google Scholar
16. Engelsberg, A. C., U.S. Patent No. 5 024 968 and patents issued and pending.Google Scholar
17. Engelsberg, A. C., in Surface Semiconductor Processing, edited by Higashi, G, S., Irene, E. A. and Ohmi, T. (Maters. Res. Soc. Proc. 315, Pittsburgh, PA, 1993) p.255–260.Google Scholar
18. Engelsberg, A. C., in Proceedings, Microcontamination 93 (San Jose, CA), p.Google Scholar
19. Engelsberg, A. C., in Proceedings, Microcontamination 93 (San Jose, CA), p. ref. 14.Google Scholar