Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-7cvxr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-29T12:12:11.842Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

RF MEMS Behavior, Surface Roughness and Asperity Contact

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 February 2011

O. Rezvanian
Affiliation:
orezvan@ncsu.edu, North Carolina State University, Department of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering, Raleigh, NC, 27695, United States
M. A. Zikry
Affiliation:
zikry@ncsu.edu, North Carolina State University, Department of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering, Raleigh, NC, 27695, United States
C. Brown
Affiliation:
orezvan@ncsu.edu, North Carolina State University, Department of Physics, Raleigh, NC, 27695, United States
J. Krim
Affiliation:
orezvan@ncsu.edu, North Carolina State University, Department of Physics, Raleigh, NC, 27695, United States
Get access

Abstract

Modeling predictions and experimental measurements were obtained to characterize the electro-mechanical response of radio frequency (RF) microelectromechanical (MEM) switches due to variations in surface roughness and finite asperity deformations. A Weierstrass-Mandelbrot fractal representation was used to generate three-dimensional surface roughness profiles. Contact asperity deformations due to applied contact pressures, were then obtained by a creep constitutive formulation. The contact pressure is derived from the interrelated effects of roughness characteristics, material hardening and softening, temperature increases due to Joule heating, and contact forces. The numerical predictions were qualitatively consistent with the experimental measurements and observations of how contact resistance evolves as a function of deformation time history. This study provides a framework that is based on an integrated modeling and experimental measurements, which can be used in design of reliable RF MEMS devices with extended life cycles.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2008

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Brown, E.R, IEEE Trans. Microw. Theory Tech. 1868–80, 46 (1998).Google Scholar
2 Rebeiz, G.M RF MEMS, Theory, Design, and Technology, New York: Wiley (2003).Google Scholar
3 Johnson, K.L Contact Mechanics, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press (1985).Google Scholar
4 Greenwood, J.A, and J.Williamson, B.P, Proc. R. Soc. London A 300–19, 295 (1966).Google Scholar
5 Majumdar, S., McGruer, N.E, Adams, G.G, Zavracky, P.M, Morrison, R.H, and Krim, J., Sensor Actuators A 19–26, 93 (2001).Google Scholar
6 Mandelbrot, B.B, The Fractal Geometry of Nature, New York: Freeman (1983).Google Scholar
7 Patton, S.T, and Zabinski, J.S, Tribol. Lett., 215–230, 18 (2005).Google Scholar
8 Jensen, B.D, Chow, L.L, Huang, K., Saitou, K., Volakis, J.L, and Kurabayashi, K., J. Microelectromech. Syst. 935–946, 14 (2005).Google Scholar
9 Wexler, G., Proc. Phys. Soc., 927–41, 89 (1966).Google Scholar
10 Holm, R., Electric Contacts: Theory and Applications 4th edn Berlin: Springer (1967).Google Scholar
11 Rezvanian, O., Zikry, M.A, Brown, C., Krim, J., J. Micromech. Microeng., 2006–15, 17 (2007).Google Scholar