Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-m6dg7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-13T05:51:56.602Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Salt Fog Testing Iron-Based Amorphous Alloys

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  19 October 2011

Raul B. Rebak
Affiliation:
rebak1@llnl.gov, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, Chemistry and Materials Science, 7000 East Ave, L-631, Livermore, CA, 94550, United States, 925-422-1854, 925-422-2105
Louis F. Aprigliano
Affiliation:
l.aprigliano@mchsi.com, Consultant, Berlin, MD, 21811, United States
S. Daniel Day
Affiliation:
day24@llnl.gov, LLNL, Livermore, CA, 94550, United States
Joseph C. Farmer
Affiliation:
farmer4@llnl.gov, LLNL, Livermore, CA, 94550, United States
Get access

Abstract

Iron-based amorphous alloys are hard and highly corrosion resistant, which make them desirable for salt water and other applications. These alloys can be produced as powder and can be deposited as coatings on any surface that needs to be protected from the environment. It was of interest to examine the behavior of these amorphous alloys in the standard salt-fog testing ASTM B 117. Three different amorphous coating compositions were deposited on 316L SS coupons and exposed for many cycles of the salt fog test. Other common engineering alloys such as 1018 carbon steel, 316L SS and Hastelloy C-22 were also tested together with the amorphous coatings. Results show that amorphous coatings are resistant to rusting in salt fog. Partial devitrification may be responsible for isolated rust spots in one of the coatings.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2007

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Scully, J. R. and Lucente, A., “Corrosion of Amorphous Metals,” ASM Handbook, Volume 13B, Corrosion: Materials, p. 476 (ASM International, 2005: Materials Park, OH).Google Scholar
2. Hashimoto, K., Asami, K., Naka, M. and Masumoto, T., Corr. Sci., 19, 857 (1979)Google Scholar
3. Asami, K., Naka, M., Hashimoto, K. and Masumoto, T., J. Electrochem. Soc., 127, 76 (1991).Google Scholar
4. Habazaki, H., Kawashima, A., Asami, K. and Hashimoto, K., J. Electrochem. Soc., 138, 2130 (1980).Google Scholar
5. Scully, J. R., Gebert, A. and Payer, J. H., submitted for publication, 2006 Google Scholar
6. Rebak, R. B. and Payer, J. H., “Passive Corrosion Behavior of Alloy 22,” in proceedings of the International High-Level Radioactive Waste Management -IHLRWM- Conference, p. 493, Las Vegas, NV April 30 to May 04, 2006, (American Nuclear Society, La Grange Park, IL).Google Scholar
7. Farmer, J. C., Haslam, J. J., Day, S. D., Branagan, D. J., Blue, C. A., Rivard, J. D. K., Aprigliano, L. F., Yang, N., Perepezko, J. H. and Beardsley, M. B., “Corrosion Characterization of Iron-Based High-Performance Amorphous-Metal Thermal-Spray Coatings,” in proceedings of 2005 ASME PVP Conference 17–21 July 2005, Vol.7, Operations, Applications and Components, p. 583 (New York, NY: ASME, 2005).Google Scholar
8. Shen, J., Chen, Q., Sun, J., Fan, H. and Wang, G., Applied Physics Letters, 86, 151907 (2005).Google Scholar
9. ASTM International, Volume 03.02, Standard B 117 “Standard Test Method of Salt Spray (Fog) Testing,” (ASTM International, 2004: West Conshohocken, PA).Google Scholar