Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-g7gxr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-10T06:02:05.669Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Science Underlying Radioactive Waste Management: Status and Needs-Twenty Years Later

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  03 September 2012

Rustum Roy
Rustum Roy*
Affiliation:
Materials Research Laboratory, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA 16802
Get access

Abstract

The setting of the technical subsystem within the overall socio-political-economic-technical radwaste system will be described and the highly interactive nature of the larger setting emphasized. It will be shown that because of the dominance of the socio-political subsystem, the importance of the technical subsystem is overshadowed. Moreover the key issue in the technical subsystem, whether to put more reliance on the immobilization (via the waste package or engineeered barriers) or the isolation (via the geology) has stayed tilted toward the latter since 1978, when we organized the first symposium on radwaste science (at the Materials Research Society meeting). Now that the isolation strategy is stymied, the opportunity arises again for the materials community to make a compelling case for the waste package's true significance.

This review is made mainly from the perspective of one laboratory in one country, the U.S. What is remarkable about the state of research in the technical subsystem is how little the big picture of the science or the technology has changed after some billions spent on R/D. The borosilicate glass (almost unchanged) is still the establishment's choice of reference waste form for HLW Cost, however, is finally forcing cement encapsulated forms to be given a second look. Mineral-modeled ceramics have received a great deal of scientific attention but remain esoteric to managers. It will be shown that in the author's opinion an enormous amount of detailed science has been done but most of it is unlikely to prove to be of any relevance or use. The policy implications for future R/D are discussed.

Type
Research Article
Information
MRS Online Proceedings Library (OPL) , Volume 465: Symposium II – Scienfific Basis for Nuclear Waste Management XX , 1996 , 3
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1997

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1. Roy, R., “Science Underlying RWM: Status and Needs,” Scientific Basis for Nuclear Waste Management, McCarthy, G. J. (ed.), Plenum, NY (1979).Google Scholar
2. Roy, R., Radioactive Waste Disposal; The Waste Package, Pergamon Press, NY (1982).Google Scholar
3. McCarthy, G. J. et al. , “Interactions Between Nuclear Waste and Surrounding Rock,” Nature 272: 216 (1978).Google Scholar
4. Siemer, D., Bonanno, E. J. et al. , “The Disposal of Orphan Wastes Using the Greater Confinement Disposal Facility,” Waste Management '91, Vol. 1, Post and Wacked (eds.), pp. 861–868 (1991).Google Scholar
5. McCarthy, G. and Davidson, M. T., “Ceramic Nuclear Waste Forms,” Bull. Am. Ceram. Soc. 54: 782 (1975).Google Scholar
6. See for details Vance, E. R. et al. , this volume, p—, p.—.Google Scholar
7. Roy, R., Vance, E. R., and Alamo, J., “[NZP] A New Radiophase for Ceramic Nuclear Waste Form,” mat. Res. Bull. 17: 585 (1982).Google Scholar
8. Hydroxylated Ceramic Waste Forms and the Absurdity of Leach Tests, Proc. Inti. Seminar on High Level Waste Solidification, Udoj, R. and Merz, E. (eds), pp. 576–602 (1982). See alsoGoogle Scholar
Paulus, W. J., Komarneni, S., and Roy, R., “Bulk Synthesis and Selective Exchange of Strontium Ions in Na4Mg6Al4Si4O20F4 Mica,” Nature 357: 571–373 (1992);Google Scholar
Komarneni, S. and Roy, R., “A Cesium Selective Ion Sieve made by Topotactic Leaching of Pholgopite Mica,” Science 239: 1286–1288 (1988).Google Scholar
9. Roy, R., Reverse Thermodynamic Chemical Barrier for Nuclear Waste, U.S. Patent 4,430, 256 (1982);Google Scholar
Komarneni, S. and Roy, R., “Hydrothermal Transformations in Candidate Overpack Materials.” Nucl. Tech. 54: 118–122 (1981).Google Scholar
10. Roy, D. M., “Cementitious Materials in Nuclear Waste Management,” 9th Intl. Congress on the Chemistry of Cement, Congress Reports VI 88–113 (NCB, New Delhi, India 110049, 1992).Google Scholar
11. Siemer, D., Scheetz, B. E. and Gougar, M. L., “Hot hostarie Press (HIP) Vitrification of Radwaste Concretes,” Scientific Basis for Nuclear Waste Management XIX, 412: 403–410 (1995).Google Scholar