Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-4rdpn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-10T10:07:56.314Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Self Assembly of Anisotropic Organic Molecules: Diffusion versus Sticking Anisotropy

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 February 2011

Stephen Berkebile
Affiliation:
stephen.berkebile@stud.uni-graz.at, Karl-Franzens University Graz, Institute of Physics, Universitaetsplatz 5, Graz, N/A, 8010, Austria
Georg Koller
Affiliation:
georg.koller@uni-graz.at
Gregor Hlawacek
Affiliation:
gregor.hlawacek@unileoben.ac.at
Martin Oehzelt
Affiliation:
martin.oehzelt@TUGraz.at
Roland Resel
Affiliation:
roland.resel@TUGraz.at
Falko P. Netzer
Affiliation:
falko.netzer@uni-graz.at
Michael G. Ramsey
Affiliation:
michael.ramsey@uni-graz.at
Get access

Abstract

The molecular/crystal orientation and morphology of active molecular structures is a key determinant for the function of nanoscaled organic devices. In π-conjugated systems, both charge transport and optical properties will strongly depend on the molecular orientation due to the highly anisotropic charge carrier mobility in these organic crystals and the anisotropic absorption and luminescence behavior of the molecules. Although the importance of organic on inorganic interface formation and thin film growth is widely acknowledged, little is known regarding the growth kinetics. A better understanding of the processes driving molecular self-assembly is necessary if the self-assembly process is to be controlled. Moreover, it is interesting as the anisotropy of the molecular building blocks presents a fundamental difference from what is known from inorganic growth. Here we show that either sticking or diffusion anisotropy can control the growth depending on preparation conditions. This is illustrated by an investigation into the growth of sexiphenyl (6P) on the anisotropic TiO2(110)-(1×1) surface for temperatures between 80K and 400K using in-situ UHV photoemission, x-ray absorption spectroscopy, synchrotron x-ray diffraction and ex-situ atomic force microscopy. For 6P adsorption even at 80K we found that the molecules orient parallel to the TiO2 oxygen rows and form small crystallites. At 300K this molecular orientation is retained and large micrometer sized 6P(203) oriented needles running perpendicular to oxygen substrate rows are formed. In contrast, for growth at elevated temperatures the 6P molecular axis is near perpendicular to the surface and large islands elongated parallel to the substrate rows are formed. These differences in crystallite orientation and morphology can be explained by the domination of the growth kinetics by either sticking or diffusion anisotropy depending on growth temperature.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2006

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Ivanco, J., Winter, B., Netzer, F. P., Ramsey, M. G., Adv. Mater. 15, p. 18121815 (2003).Google Scholar
2 Verlaak, S., Steudel, S., Heremans, P., Janssen, D., Deleuze, M. S., Phys. Rev. B 68, 195409 (2003).Google Scholar
3 Heringdorf, F.-J. Meyer zu, Reuter, M. C., Tromp, R. M., Appl. Phys. A 78, 787791 (2004).Google Scholar
4 Koller, G., Berkebile, S., Krenn, J., Tzvetkov, G., Hlawacek, G., Lengyel, O., Netzer, F. P., Ramsey, M. G., Teichert, C., Resel, R., Adv. Mater. 16, 21592162 (2004).Google Scholar
5 Resel, R., Oehzelt, M., Thierry, A., Koller, G., Netzer, F. P., Ramsey, M. G., in preparation.Google Scholar
6 Mo, Y. W., Kleiner, J., Webb, M. B., Lagally, M. G., PRL 66, 19982001 (1991).Google Scholar
7 Ebner, C., Park, K.-B., Nielsen, J.-F., Pelz, J. P., Phys. Rev. B 68, 245404 (2003).Google Scholar
8 Hu, W.-S., Lin, Y.-F., Tao, Y.-T., Hsu, Y.-J., Wei, D.-H., Macromolecules 38, 96179624 (2005).Google Scholar
9 Balzer, F., Rubahn, H.-G., APL 79, 38603862 (2001).Google Scholar