Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-s2hrs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-10T08:56:57.308Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

A Self-Locking Technique With Fast Response and High Sensitivity for Micro-Cantilever Based Sensing of Analytes

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 February 2011

A. Mehta ,
G. Muralidharan ,
A. Passian ,
S. Cherian ,
T.L. Ferrell  and
T. Thundat
A. Mehta
Affiliation:
Life Sciences Division, Oak Ridge National Lab, Oak Ridge, TN 37831
G. Muralidharan
Affiliation:
Life Sciences Division, Oak Ridge National Lab, Oak Ridge, TN 37831
A. Passian
Affiliation:
Life Sciences Division, Oak Ridge National Lab, Oak Ridge, TN 37831
S. Cherian
Affiliation:
Life Sciences Division, Oak Ridge National Lab, Oak Ridge, TN 37831
T.L. Ferrell
Affiliation:
Life Sciences Division, Oak Ridge National Lab, Oak Ridge, TN 37831
T. Thundat*
Affiliation:
Life Sciences Division, Oak Ridge National Lab, Oak Ridge, TN 37831
*
*Author to whom correspondence should be addressed
Get access

Abstract

MEMS based microcantilevers have been employed as sensors in both liquid and ambient conditions. One scheme for detection is based upon monitoring the change in microcantilever resonant frequency as a function of the adsorbed analyte concentration. However, the sensitivity is limited by the accuracy of the frequency measurements, which is a function of the Q-factor of the vibrating element and the measurement bandwidth. In this paper, we present a feedback scheme for self-locking amplification of the small-amplitude thermal oscillations of the microcantilever. Using this approach, we demonstrate an improvement in the Q-factor by two to three orders of magnitude as compared to that of the undriven microcantilever. Use of this technique eliminates the need for lock-in detection and results in improved response times for sensor applications. Experiments using the proposed feedback amplification technique show improved sensitivity for the detection of biological molecules in liquids, and for adsorbed vapors under ambient conditions.

Type
Research Article
Information
MRS Online Proceedings Library (OPL) , Volume 723: Symposia M/O – Molecularly Imprinted Materials – Chemical and Biological Sensors-Materials and Devices , 2002 , O6.7
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2002

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Chen, G. Y. Thundat, T., Wachter, E. A. and Warmack, R. J. Journal Of Applied Physics. 77, 3618–3622 (1995)Google Scholar
2. Thundat, T., Warmack, R. J. Chen, G. Y. and Allison, D. P. Applied Physics Letters. 64, 2894–2896 (1994)Google Scholar
3. Fritz, J., Baller, M. K. Lang, H. P. Rothuizen, H., Vettiger, P., Meyer, E., Guntherodt, H. J. Gerber, C., and Gimzewski, J. K. Science. 288, 316–318 (2000)Google Scholar
4. Raiteri, R., Nelles, G., Butt, H. J. Knoll, W., and Skladal, P., Sensors and Actuators BChemical. 61, 213–217 (1999)Google Scholar
5. Thundat, T., Wachter, E. A. Sharp, S. L. and Warmack, R. J. Applied Physics Letters. 66, 1695–1697 (1995)Google Scholar
6. Butt, H. J. Journal of Colloid and Interface Science. 180, 251–260 (1996)Google Scholar
7. Tamayo, J., Humphris, A. D. L., Malloy, A. M. and Miles, M. J. Ultramicroscopy. 86, 167–173 (2001)Google Scholar
8. Mehta, A., Cherian, S., Hedden, D., and Thundat, T., Applied Physics Letters. 78, 1637–1639 (2001)Google Scholar
9. Sarid, D, Oxford Series on Optical Sciences, (1991)Google Scholar
10. Vig, J. R. and Kim, Y., Ieee Transactions On Ultrasonics Ferroelectrics And Frequency Control. 46, 1558–1565 (1999)Google Scholar
11. Durig, U., Steinauer, H. R. and Blanc, N., Journal of Applied Physics. 82, 3641–3651 (1997)Google Scholar
12. Albrecht, T. R. Grutter, P., Horne, D., and Rugar, D., Journal of Applied Physics. 69, 668–673 (1991)Google Scholar
13. Tamayo, J., Humphris, AD L., and Miles, M. J. Applied Physics Letters. 77, 582–584 (2000)Google Scholar