Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-lj6df Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-13T02:20:45.679Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Studies of Defects and Limits of Solid Solubility in SPE Grown in and Sb Implanted Silicon

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 February 2011

J. Narayan
Affiliation:
Solid State Division, Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Oak Ridge, Tennessee 37830
O. W. Holland
Affiliation:
Solid State Division, Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Oak Ridge, Tennessee 37830
Get access

Abstract

Transmission electron microscopy (plan-view as well as cross-section) and high-resolution Rutherford backscattering and channeling techniques have been combined to investigate residual defects and substitutional concentrations of In and Sb in <100> and <111> orientations of ion implanted silicon layers after solid-phase-epitaxial (SPE) growth at 475–600°C. The maximum concentrations of Sb and In in substitutional sites were found to be, respectively, 1.3 × 1021 and 5.0 × 1019 cm−3 , exceeding the respective retrograde maxima by factors of 18 and 60. These results provide direct evidence of solute trapping and metastable alloying under solid-phase growth conditions. Accumulation of solute at the crystalline-amorphous interface was observed only for indium above a certain interfacial concentration. At still higher interfacial concentrations, the planar interface was observed to become unstable and SPE growth was retarded.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1982

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

*

Research sponsored by the Division of Materials Sciences, U. S. Department of Energy under contract W-7405-eng-26 with Union Carbide Corporation.

References

REFERENCES

1.Csepregi, L., Kennedy, E. F., Mayer, J. W. and Sigmon, T. W., J. Appl. Phys. 49, 3906 (1978).Google Scholar
2.Blood, P., Brown, W. L. and Miller, G. L., J. Appl. Phys. 50, 173 (1979).Google Scholar
3.Williams, J. S. and Elliman, R. G., Appl. Phys. Lett. (in press).Google Scholar
4.Fletcher, J., Narayan, J. and Holland, O. W., p. 121 in Microscopy of Semiconducting Materials, 1981, ed. by Cullis, A. G. and Joy, D. C., Institute of Physics, London (60), 1981.Google Scholar
5.Chu, W. K., p. 117 in Defects in Semiconductors, ed. by Narayan, J. and Tan, T. Y., North-Holland, New York, 1981.Google Scholar
6.Picraux, S. T., p. 135, ibid.Google Scholar
7.White, C. W., Wilson, S. R., Appleton, B. R. and Young, F. W. Jr., J. Appl. Phys. 51, 738 (1980).Google Scholar
8.Narayan, J., J. Appl. Phys. 52, 1289 (1981).Google Scholar
9.Reiss, H. and Fuller, C. S., p. 222 in Semiconductors, ed. by Hannay, N. B., Reinhold, 1959.Google Scholar
10.Narayan, J. and Holland, O. W. (to be published).Google Scholar
11.Van Vechten, J. A. and Phillips, J. C., Phys. Rev. B 2, 2160 (1970).Google Scholar
12.Pauling, L., p. 179 in The Nature of Chemical Bond, Cornell University Press, Ithaca, New York, 1948.Google Scholar