Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-dzt6s Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-28T19:46:47.079Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Study of dynamic features of highly energetic reactions by DSC and High-Speed Temperature Scanner (HSTS)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 February 2013

M.A. Hobosyan
Affiliation:
University of Texas at Brownsville, Department of Physics and Astronomy, Brownsville, TX 78520, USA
Kh.G. Kirakosyan
Affiliation:
Institute of Chemical Physics NAS RA, Yerevan, 0014, Armenia
S.L. Kharatyan
Affiliation:
Institute of Chemical Physics NAS RA, Yerevan, 0014, Armenia Yerevan State University, Yerevan, 0025, Armenia,
K.S. Martirosyan*
Affiliation:
University of Texas at Brownsville, Department of Physics and Astronomy, Brownsville, TX 78520, USA
Get access

Abstract

The dynamic features of Al2O3 - polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE) and Al - PTFE reactions in non-isothermal conditions are presented. The Differential Scanning Calorimetry (DSC) and High-Speed Temperature Scanner (HSTS) were used to characterize the Al2O3/Al – PTFE reactions at different heating rates. The study shows that the HSTS instrument can give more information about the reaction mechanism and kinetics than the conventional DSC measurements. In this work we show that high heating rates may reveal exothermic reaction between Al2O3 and PTFE that were previously unidentified. The PTFE can potentially remove the oxide layer from aluminum in the initial period of the reaction and increase the direct contact area between oxygen and aluminum, which increases the reaction velocity and improves the energy release abilities of the system.

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2013

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Dlott, D.D., Mat. Sci.. and Tech. 22, 4, 463, 2006.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Martirosyan, K.S., J. Mater. Chem., 21, 94009405, 2011.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Martirosyan, K.S., Wang, L., Vicent, A., and Luss, D., Nanotechnology, 20, 405609, 2009.10.1088/0957-4484/20/40/405609CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jr.Holt, W.H., Mock, W., and Santiago, F. J., Appl.Phys., 88, 5485, 2000.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ames, R., Energy release characteristics of impact initiated energetic materials, Mater. Res. Soc.Symp. Proc., 896, 123132, 2006.Google Scholar
Denisaev, A.A., Steinberg, A.S., and Berlin, A.A., Doklady Physical Chemistry, 414, 2, 139142, 2007.10.1134/S001250160706005XCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dobrantz, P., and Crawford, P., LLNL explosives handbook, properties of chemical explosives and explosive sindlants (UCRL-51319). California: Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, University of California, 1972.Google Scholar
Starink, M. J., Thermochim. Acta, 404(1), 163, 2003.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Starink, M.J., J. Mater. Sci. 36, 4433, 2001.10.1023/A:1017974517877CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fan, R.H., Lu, H.L., Suna, K.N., Wangand, W.X., Yi, X.B., Thermochim. Acta 440, 129, 2006.10.1016/j.tca.2005.10.020CrossRefGoogle Scholar