Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-94fs2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-14T17:17:24.108Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Study of the Effects of Potential Impurities from Actinide Flux on the Zirconolite Microstructure

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 February 2011

G. Leturcq  and
B. Auzemerie
G. Leturcq
Affiliation:
CEA Valrhô, DEN/DIEC/SCDV/LEBM - B.P. 17171 – 30207 Bagnols/Cèze cedex, France
B. Auzemerie
Affiliation:
CEA Valrhô, DEN/DIEC/SCDV/LEBM - B.P. 17171 – 30207 Bagnols/Cèze cedex, France
Get access

Abstract

Zirconolite ceramics are candidate hosts for the containment of minor actinides from the reprocessing of spent fuel in France. Although actinide-doped or rare earth-doped zirconolite ceramics have been successfully produced from pure chemical precursors, there has been little focus on the effect of impurities on the zirconolite microstructure. However, this aspect is crucial for technical feasibility to guarantee a microstructure acceptable for nuclear waste management needs.

First, chemical elements from the reprocessing process that could enter into the actinide flux as impurities were listed. We considered rare earths, zirconium, platinoids (Ru, Rh, Pd), molybdenum, barium, cadmium, silver, caesium, iron, and strontium. As we know rare earths and zirconium entering into the zirconolite microstructure they were not included in the study. For each other impurity listed, a zirconolite batch containing 1 wt% oxide impurity, and enriched in Nd simulating minor actinides, was synthesised then examined by SEM. Impurities were then categorised into those digested into the zirconolite microstructure, those partially digested into the zirconolite microstructure but also forming their own phases, and those that did not enter into zirconolite and formed their own separate phases.

A sample was then produced containing all the impurities, to assess any interference effects. Three minor phases were observed: barium molybdenum oxide, noble metal alloy and zirconium titanium dioxide. These minor phases should not decrease the chemical durability of the ceramic, and therefore, we can conclude that zirconolite is not seriously affected by the impurities introduced.

Type
Research Article
Information
MRS Online Proceedings Library (OPL) , Volume 807: Symposium Scientific Basis for Nuclear Waste Management XXVII , 2003 , 285
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2004

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1. Vance, E.R., Jostsons, A., Day, R.A., Ball, C.J., Begg, B.D. and Angel, P.J. In Mater. Res. Soc. Symp. Proc. 412, 41–47 (1996).Google Scholar
2. Begg, B.D., Vance, E.R., Day, R.A., Hambley, M. and Conradson, S.D. In Mater. Res. Soc. Symp. Proc. 465, 325–332 (1997).Google Scholar
3. Vance, E.R., Jostsons, A., Moricca, S., Stewart, M.W.A., Day, R.A., Begg, B.D., Hambley, M.J., Hart, K.P. and Ebbinghaus, B.B. In Ceramic Transactions, vol. 93, 323–329 (1999).Google Scholar
4. Fillet, C., Marillet, J., Dussossoy, J.L. and Phalippou, J., In ACERS Fall Meeting proceeding 1997, Cincinatti (1997).Google Scholar
5. Advocat, T., Fillet, C., Marillet, J., Leturcq, G., Boubals, J.M. and Bonnetier, A. In Mater. Res. Soc. Symp. Proc. 506 (1998).Google Scholar
6. Leturcq, G.. PhD thesis, univ. Toulouse III, France, 207p. (1998)Google Scholar
7. Leturcq, G., Advocat, T., Hart, K., Berger, G., Lacombe, J., Bonnetier, A.. American Mineralogist, vol. 86, 871–880 (2001)Google Scholar
8. Vance, E.R., Ball, C.J., Blackford, M.G., Cassidy, D.J. and Smith, K.L.. J. Nucl. Mater., 175 (1990)Google Scholar