Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-cphqk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-01-28T10:06:36.194Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Study of Transcrystallization in Polymer Composites

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 February 2011

Benjamin S. Hsiao  and
J. H. Eric
Benjamin S. Hsiao
Affiliation:
E. I. du Pont de Nemours & Company, Inc., Fibers Department, Pioneering Research Laboratory, Experimental Station, P.O. Box 80302, Wilmington, Delaware 19880-0302
J. H. Eric
Affiliation:
E. I. du Pont de Nemours & Company, Inc., Fibers Department, Pioneering Research Laboratory, Experimental Station, P.O. Box 80302, Wilmington, Delaware 19880-0302
Get access

Abstract

Transcrystallization of semicrystalline polymers, such as PEEK, PEKK and PPS, in high performance composites has been investigated. It is found that PPDT aramid fiber and pitch-based carbon fiber induce a transcrystalline interphase in all three polymers, whereas in PAN-based carbon fiber and glass fiber systems, transcrystallization occurs only under specific circumstances. Epitaxy is used to explain the surface-induced transcrystalline interphase in the first case. In the latter case, transcrystallization is probably not due to epitaxy, but may be attributed to the thermal conductivity mismatch. Plasma treatment on the fiber surface showed a negligible effect on inducing transcrystallization, implying that surface-free energy was not important. A microdebonding test was adopted to evaluate the interfacial strength between the fiber and matrix. Our preliminary results did not reveal any effect on the fiber/matrix interfacial strength of transcrystallinity.

Type
Research Article
Information
MRS Online Proceedings Library (OPL) , Volume 170: Symposium N – Interfaces in Composites , 1989 , 117
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1990

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Wunderlich, B., Macromolecular Physics, Vol.2, Academic Press, NY (1973)Google Scholar
2. Kwei, T.K., Schonhorn, H. and Frisch, H.L., J. Appl. Phys., 38, 2512 (1967)Google Scholar
3. Frisch, H.L. and Schonhorn, H., J. Elastoplast., 3, 214 (1971)Google Scholar
4. Lee, Y.G. and Porter, R.S., Polymer Eng. Sci., 26 (9), 633 (1986)Google Scholar
5. Nguyen, H.X., Ph. D. Thesis Case Western Reserve University (1986)Google Scholar
6. Waddon, A.J., Hill, M.J., Keller, A. and Blundell, D.J., J. Mat. Sci., 22, 1773 (1987)Google Scholar
7. Desio, G.P., Textile Research Institute, Notes of Research, No. 417 (1988)Google Scholar
8. Hardwich, S.T., Ph.D. Thesis, Brunel University, UK (1987)Google Scholar
9. Hagenson, R.L., et al., SAMPE, Vol.34, Book 2, 2255 (1989)Google Scholar
10. Bassell, T., Hull, D. and Shortall, J.B., Faraday Spec. Disc., Chem. Soc., 2, 137 (1972)Google Scholar
11. Mandell, J.F., Chen, E.J.H. and McGarry, F.J., Intl. J. Adhesion and Adhesives, 1, 40 (1980)Google Scholar
12. Zettlemoyer, A.C., Nucleation, Marcel Dekker, Inc., NY (1969)Google Scholar
13. Lavin, J.G., Private Communication (Nov., 1989)Google Scholar
14. Baer, E., Koenig, J.L., Lando, J.B. and Litt, M.H., SPI, 26th Annual Technical Conference, 20-E, 1 (1971)Google Scholar
15. Oberlin, A., Carbon, 22 (6), 521 (1984)Google Scholar
16. Surface energy of AU-4 is 42.4 dyne/cm, plasma-treated AU-4 is 72.6 dyne/cm, measured by contact angle method.Google Scholar
17. Wu, S.H., Polymer Interface and Adhesion, Marcel Dekker, Inc., NY (1982)Google Scholar
18. Gardner, K., Private Communication (October, 1989)Google Scholar