Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-lj6df Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-13T02:52:27.013Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Surface Impedance and Granularity in Superconducting Cuprates

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 February 2011

J. Halbritter
J. Halbritter*
Affiliation:
Appl. Phys. Stanford University, STANFORD, CA 94305 and Kernforschungszentrum, Postfach 3640, 7500 KARLSRUHE, W.- Germany
Get access

Abstract

The rf residual surface resistance Rres is an important figure of merit for superconducting microwave devices and for establishing the homogeneity of superconducting surfaces. In granular superconductors not only are high residual rf surface resistance values Rres observed, but also strong field dependencies of Rres(T,ω, Hrf) and the penetraton depth λres(T, ω, Hrf) are encountered even at very low field levels (of order 1 Oe). These observations can be explained in terms of granularity consisting of weak links and of insulating interfaces, which provide additional degrees of freedom due to fluxoid motion and electromagnetic strip line modes. These degrees of freedom cause additional interaction mechanisms with applied rf fields.

Type
Research Article
Information
MRS Online Proceedings Library (OPL) , Volume 195: Symposium S – Physical Phenomena in Granular Materials , 1990 , 391
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1990

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1. Wu, Dong-Ho, Shiffman, C. A., Sridhar, S., Phys. Rev. B 38, 9311 (1988) and S. Sridhar, Doug-Ho Wu, W. Kennedy, Phys. Rev Lett. 63, 1873 (1989).Google Scholar
2. Li, Q., Rigby, K. W., Radkowski, M. S., Phys. Rev. B 39, 6607 (1989) and M. Sato, T. Konaka, I. Sankawa Proc. 1989 International Superconducting Electronics Conference (ISEC '89), Tokyo, June 12, 1989; p. 247.Google Scholar
3. Delayen, J. R., Bohn, C. L., Phys. Rev. B40, 5151 (1989).Google Scholar
4. Oates, D. F., Mankiewich, P. M., Howard, R. E., O'Malley, M. L., Appl. Phys. Lett. submitted.Google Scholar
5. Halbritter, J., submitted to J. Appl. Phys.Google Scholar
6. Halbritter, J., submitted to J. Mat. Research.Google Scholar
7.see e.g. Hass, K. C., Solid State Physics 42 (Eds. Ehrenreich, H., Turnbull, D., Acad. Press, New York, 1989) p. 213; R. Beyers, T. M. Shaw, ibid p. 135.Google Scholar
8. Tinkham, M., Lobb, C. J., ibid Ref. 1, p. 91; J. Clem, Physica C 153, 50 (1988).Google Scholar
9. Ekin, J. W., Larson, T. M., Hermann, A. M., Sheng, Z. Z., Tagona, K., Kumakura, H., Physica C 160, 489 (1989).Google Scholar