Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-p9bg8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-29T03:54:49.112Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Technetium Getters to Improve Cast Stone Performance

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  23 March 2015

James J. Neeway ,
Amanda R. Lawter ,
R. Jeffrey Serne ,
R. Matthew Asmussen  and
Nikolla P. Qafoku
James J. Neeway
Affiliation:
Pacific Northwest National Laboratory, Energy and Environment Directorate Richland, WA 99352, U.S.A.
Amanda R. Lawter
Affiliation:
Pacific Northwest National Laboratory, Energy and Environment Directorate Richland, WA 99352, U.S.A.
R. Jeffrey Serne
Affiliation:
Pacific Northwest National Laboratory, Energy and Environment Directorate Richland, WA 99352, U.S.A.
R. Matthew Asmussen
Affiliation:
Pacific Northwest National Laboratory, Energy and Environment Directorate Richland, WA 99352, U.S.A.
Nikolla P. Qafoku
Affiliation:
Pacific Northwest National Laboratory, Energy and Environment Directorate Richland, WA 99352, U.S.A.
Get access

Abstract

A cementitious waste form known as Cast Stone is the baseline waste form for solidification of aqueous secondary wastes, including Hanford Tank Waste Treatment and Immobilization Plant (WTP) secondary liquid effluents to be treated and solidified at the Hanford Site Effluent Treatment Facility. Cast Stone is also being evaluated as a possible supplemental immobilization technology to provide the necessary low activity waste (LAW) treatment capacity to complete the Hanford tank waste cleanup mission in a timely and cost effective manner. Two radionuclides of particular concern in these waste streams are technetium-99 (99Tc) and iodine-129 (129I). These radioactive tank waste components are predicted to contribute the most risk to groundwater – the most probable pathway for future environmental impacts associated with the cleanup of the Hanford site. A recent environmental assessment of Cast Stone performance, which assumes a diffusion controlled release of contaminants from the waste form, calculates groundwater in excess of the allowable maximum permissible concentrations for both contaminants. There is, therefore, a need and an opportunity to improve the retention of both 99Tc and 129I in Cast Stone. One method to improve the performance of Cast Stone is through the addition of “getters” that selectively sequester Tc and I, therefore reducing their diffusion out of Cast Stone. In this paper, we present results of Tc and I removal from solution with various getters. Batch sorption experiments were conducted with deionized water (DIW) and a highly caustic LAW simulant with a 7.8 M average Na concentration. In general, the data show that the selected getters are effective in DIW but their performance is compromised when experiments are performed with the 7.8 M Na Ave LAW simulant. The diminished performance in the LAW simulant may be due to competition with Cr present in the 7.8 M Na Ave LAW simulant and to a pH effect that may create a negatively charged surface that can repel negatively charged species.

Keywords

waste managementadditivesscanning electron microscopy (SEM)
Type
Articles
Information
MRS Online Proceedings Library (OPL) , Volume 1744: Symposium EE – Scientific Basis for Nuclear Waste Management XXXVIII , 2015 , pp. 43 - 52
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2015 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Langton, CA, Dukes, MD, Simmons, RV (1984) Cement-Based Waste Forms for Disposal of Savannah River Plant Low-Level Radioactive Salt Waste. In: McVay, G.L. (Ed.), Scientific Basis for Nuclear Waste Management VII. Materials Research Society, Boston, MA, 26.Google Scholar
Westsik, JH Jr, Piepel, GF, Lindberg, MJ, Heasler, PG, Mercier, TM, Russell, RL, Cozzi, AD, Daniel, WE, Eibling, RE, Hansen, EK, Reigal, MR, Swanberg, DJ (2013) Supplemental Immobilization of Hanford Low-Activity Waste: Cast Stone Screening Tests. PNNL-22747, SRNL-STI-2013–00465, Rev. 0, Pacific Northwest National Laboratory, Richland, WA and Savannah River National Laboratory, Aiken, SC.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chung, CW, Turo, LA, Ryan, JV, Johnson, BR, McCloy, JS (2013) The effect of concentration on the structure and crystallinity of a cementitious waste form for caustic wastes. Journal of Nuclear Materials, 437, 332–340.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mann, FM, Puigh, RJ, Finfrock, SH, Khaleel, R, Wood, MI (2003) Integrated Disposal Facility Risk Assessment. RPP-15834, Rev. 0, CH2M Hill Hanford Group, Inc., Richland, WA.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
DOE (2012) Final Tank Closure and Waste Management Environmental Impact Statement for the Hanford Site, Richland, Washington (TC & WM EIS). DOE/EIS-0391, US Department of Energy, Office of River Protection, Richland, WA.Google Scholar
Pierce, EM, Mattigod, SV, Westsik, JH Jr, Serne, RJ, Icenhower, JP, Scheele, RD, Um, W, Qafoku, NP (2010) Review of Potential Candidate Stabilization Technologies for Liquid and Solid Secondary Waste Streams. PNNL-19122, Pacific Northwest National Laboratory, Richland, WA.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Duncan, JB, Cooke, GA, Lockrem, LL (2008) Assessment of Technetium Leachability in Cement-Stablized Basin 43 Groundwater Brine. RPP-RPT-39195, Rev. 1, US Department of Energy, Richland, WA.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Qafoku, NP, Neeway, JJ, Lawter, AR, Levitskaia, TG, Serne, RJ, Westsik, JH Jr, Valenta Snyder, MM (2014) Technetium and Iodine Getters to Improve Cast Stone Performance. PNNL-23282, Pacific Northwest National Laboratory, Richland, WA.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Neeway, JJ, Qafoku, NP, Serne, RJ, Lawter, AR, Stephenson, JR, Lukens, WW, Westsik, JH Jr (2014) Evaluation of Technetium Getters to Improve the Performance of Cast Stone. PNNL-23667, Pacific Northwest National Laboratory, Richland, WA.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Asmussen, RM, Neeway, JJ, Qafoku, NP (2015) Technetium and Iodine Getters to Improve Cast Stone Performance – 15420, WM2015 Conference, Phoenix, AZ, USA.Google Scholar
Um, W, Valenta, MM, Chung, CW, Yang, J, Engelhard, MH, Serne, RJ, Parker, K, Wang, G, Cantrell, KJ, Westsik, JH Jr (2011) Radionuclide Retention Mechanisms in Secondary Waste-Form Testing: Phase II. PNNL-20753, Pacific Northwest National Laboratory, Richland, WA.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Serne, RJ, Westsik, JH Jr (2011) Data Package for Secondary Waste Form Down-Selection—Cast Stone. PNNL-20706, Pacific Northwest National Laboratory, Richland, WA.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kaplan, DI, Mattigod, SV, Parker, KE, Iversen, G (2000) Experimental Work in Support of the 129I Disposal Special Analysis. WSRC-TR-2000–00283, Rev. 0, Westinghouse Savannah River Company, Aiken, SC.Google Scholar
Um, W, Jung, HB, Wang, G, Westsik, JH Jr, Peterson, RA (2013) Characterization of Technetium Speciation in Cast Stone. PNNL-22977, Pacific Northwest National Laboratory, Richland, WA.CrossRefGoogle Scholar