Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-lj6df Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-10T11:10:27.645Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The Thermal Effects of CMP as a Particle Augmented Mixed Lubrication Tribosystem

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 August 2013

Gagan Srivastava
Affiliation:
Mechanical Engineering, Carnegie Mellon University, 5000 Forbes Ave, Pittsburgh PA 15213
C . Fred Higgs III
Affiliation:
Mechanical Engineering, Carnegie Mellon University, 5000 Forbes Ave, Pittsburgh PA 15213
Get access

Abstract

Most chemical mechanical polishing (CMP) researchers assume that the polishing occurs in the mixed-lubrication regime, where the applied load on the wafer is supported by the hydrodynamic slurry pressure and the contact stress generated during the pad-wafer contact. Consequently, the particle augmented mixed lubrication (PAML) approach has been employed as an extremely high-fidelity asperity-scale mixed-lubrication CMP model in the past. Recently, a more computationally efficient PAML approach, PAML-lite, which considers the slurry’s fluid and particle dynamics, the pad/wafer contact mechanics, and the resulting material removal, was introduced. The current work presents the PAML-lite framework with the isothermal assumption relaxed. As a result, wafer-scale interfacial temperatures during CMP can be predicted by considering asperity heating and dissipation of the heat into the solid and fluid media in the sliding contact.

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2013 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

White, D., Boning, D. and Grover, A., Chemical Mechanical Polishing for ULSI Multilevel Interconnect Conference, CMP-MIC 2000 (2000)Google Scholar
Renteln, P. and Ninh, T., Mater. Res. Soc. Symp. Proc., 566, 155 (1999)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hocheng, H. and Huang, Y., IEEE Trans. on Semiconductor Manufacturing, 17, 2 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Oh, S. and Seok, J., Microelectronic Engineering, 85, (2008)Google Scholar
Srivastava, G. and Higgs, C.F., Mater. Res. Soc. Symp. Proc., (2013)Google Scholar
Blok, H., Wear, 6, 6 (1963)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Srivastava, G. and Higgs, C. F., Proc. of STLE (2013)Google Scholar
Luo, J. and Dornfeld, D. A., IEEE Trans. on Semiconductor Manufacturing, 14, 2 (2001)Google Scholar
Kim, H. J., Ehret, P, Dowson, D and Taylor, C. M., Proc. of the Inst. of Mech. Eng., Part J: J. of Eng. Tribology, 215:339 (2001)Google Scholar
Borucki, L., Charns, L. and Philipossian, A., J. Electrochemical Soc. 151, 12(2004) G809G813 CrossRefGoogle Scholar