Hostname: page-component-54dcc4c588-42vt5 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-10-03T05:51:03.403Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Generalized hypergroups and orthogonal polynomials

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  22 January 2016

Nobuaki Obata  and
Norman J. Wildberger
Nobuaki Obata
Affiliation:
Graduate School of Polymathematics, Nagoya University, Nagoya, 464-01, Japan
Norman J. Wildberger
Affiliation:
School of Mathematics, The University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW 2052, Australia
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

We study in this paper a generalization of the notion of a discrete hypergroup with particular emphasis on the relation with systems of orthogonal polynomials. The concept of a locally compact hypergroup was introduced by Dunkl [8], Jewett [12] and Spector [25]. It generalizes convolution algebras of measures associated to groups as well as linearization formulae of classical families of orthogonal polynomials, and many results of harmonic analysis on locally compact abelian groups can be carried over to the case of commutative hypergroups; see Heyer [11], Litvinov [17], Ross [22], and references cited therein. Orthogonal polynomials have been studied in terms of hypergroups by Lasser [15] and Voit [31], see also the works of Connett and Schwartz [6] and Schwartz [23] where a similar spirit is observed.

Information

Type
Research Article
Information
Nagoya Mathematical Journal , Volume 142 , June 1996 , pp. 67 - 93
Copyright
Copyright © Editorial Board of Nagoya Mathematical Journal 1996

References

[ 1 ] Arad, Z. and Blau, H. I., On table algebras and applications to finite group theory, J. Algebra, 138 (1991), 137–185.Google Scholar
[ 2 ] Arad, Z., Fisman, E. and Blau, H. I., Table algebras and applications to products of characters in finite groups, J. Algebra, 138 (1991), 186–194.Google Scholar
[ 3 ] Bannai, E. and Ito, T., “Algebraic Combinatorics I-Association Schemes,” Benjamin and Cummings, Menlo Park, 1984.Google Scholar
[ 4 ] Berezansky, Yu. M. and Kaluzhny, A. A., Hypercomplex systems with locally compact bases, Sel. Math. Sov., 4 (1985), 151–200.Google Scholar
[ 5 ] Bloom, W. R. and Selvanathan, S., Hypergroup structures on the set of natural numbers, Bull. Austral. Math. Soc, 33 (1986), 89–102.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[ 6 ] Connett, W. C. and Schwartz, A. L., Analysis of a class of probability preserving measure algebras on compact intervals, Trans, Amer. Math. Soc, 320 (1990), 371–393.Google Scholar
[ 7 ] Curtis, C. W., Representation theory of finite groups: From Frobenius to Brauer, Math. Intelligencer, 14 (1992), 48–57.Google Scholar
[ 8 ] Dunkl, C. F., The measure algebra of a locally compact hypergroup, Trans. Amer. Math. Soc, 179 (1973), 331–348.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[ 9 ] Frobenius, G., Uber Gruppencharaktere, in “Gesammelte Abhandlungen, III” pp. 1–37, Springer-Verlag, 1968.Google Scholar
[10] Gasper, G., Linearization yof the product of Jacobi polynomials I, Can. J. Math., 22 (1970), 171–175; II, Can. J. Math., 22 (1970), 582–593.Google Scholar
[11] Heyer, H., Probability theory on hypergroups: A survey, in “Probability Measures on Groups VII (H. Heyer ed.),” pp. 481–550, Lect. Notes in Math. Vol. 1064, Springer-Verlag, 1984.Google Scholar
[12] Jewett, R. I., Spaces with an abstract convolution of measures, Adv. in Math., 18 (1975), 1–101.Google Scholar
[13] Kawada, Y., Uber den Dualitätssatz der Charactere nichtcommutativer Gruppen, Proc. Phys. Math. Soc. Japan, 24 (1942), 97–109.Google Scholar
[14] Lasser, R., Fourier-Stieltjes transforms on hypergroups, Analysis, 2 (1982), 281–303.Google Scholar
[15] Lasser, R., Orthogonal polynomials and hypergroups, Rend. Mat. Ser., VII 3 (1983), 185–209.Google Scholar
[16] Levitan, B. M., “Generalized Translation Operators and Some of Their Applications,” Israel Program for Scientific Translations, Jerusalem, 1962.Google Scholar
[17] Litvinov, G. L., Hypergroups and hypergroup algebras, J. Soviet Math., 38 (1987), 1734–1761.Google Scholar
[18] McMullen, J. R., An algebraic theory of hypergroups, Bull. Austral. Math. Soc, 20 (1979), 35–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[19] McMullen, J. R. and Price, J. F., Duality for finite abelian hypergroups over splitting fields, Bull. Austral. Math. Soc, 20 (1979), 57–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[20] Obata, N., Isometric operators on L-algebras of hypergroups, in “Probability Measures on Groups X (H. Heyer ed.),” pp. 315 — 328, Plenum, New York, 1991.Google Scholar
[21] Pedersen, G. K., “C*-Algebras and Their Automorphism Groups,” Academic Press, London, 1979.Google Scholar
[22] Ross, K. A., Hypergroups and centers of measure algebras, Symposia Math., 22 (1977), 189–203.Google Scholar
[23] Schwartz, A. L., li -Convolution algebras: Representation and factorization, Z. W., 41 (1977), 161–176.Google Scholar
[24] Sharp, W. T., Racah algebra and the contraction of groups, Mathematical Department, University of Toronto, Toronto, 1984.Google Scholar
[25] Spector, R., Mesures invariantes sur les hypergroupes, Trans. Amer. Math. Soc, 239 (1978), 147–165.Google Scholar
[26] Sunder, V. S., II1 factors, their bimodules and hypergroups, Trans. Amer. Math. Soc, 330 (1992), 227–256.Google Scholar
[27] Szegö, G., “Orthogonal Polynomials (3rd ed.),” Amer. Math. Soc Colloq. Publ., Vol. 23, Providence, 1967.Google Scholar
[28] Szwarc, R., Convolution structures and Haar matrices, J. Funct. Anal., 113 (1993), 19–35.Google Scholar
[29] Verlinde, E., Fusion rules and modular transformations in 2D conformal field theory, Nucl. Phys., B 300 (1988), 360–376.Google Scholar
[30] Voit, M., Positive characters on commutative hypergroups and some applications, Math. Z., 198 (1988), 405–421.Google Scholar
[31] Voit, M., sCentral limit theorems for a class of polynomial hypergroups, Adv. Appl. Prob., 22 (1990), 68–87.Google Scholar
[32] Voit, M., A positivity result and normalization of positive convolution structures, Math. Ann., 297 (1993), 677–692.Google Scholar
[33] Wildberger, N. J., Duality and entropy for finite commutative hypergroups and fusion rule algebras, to appear in Proc London Math. Soc.Google Scholar
[34] Wildberger, N. J., Hypergroups and harmonic analysis, Centre Math. Anal. (ANU), 29 (1992), 238–253.Google Scholar
[35] Wildberger, N. J., Finite commutative hypergroups and applications from group theory to conformal field theory, Contemp. Math., 183 (1995), 413–434.Google Scholar